The Daily SOK-Liberals "Put a SOK in it!!!"

The Day Obamacare Died #1 Ringtone in America

2009-08-22T08:30:00.001-07:00

The Left Wing Attack Machine-Tries to mute Freedom of Speech

2009-08-19T15:46:00.000-07:00

Left-Wing Attack Machine Targets Glenn Beck's Advertisers
By Jeff Poor (Bio | Archive)
August 4, 2009 - 15:05 ET

His show has usually been Fox News third-highest show, behind Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity. And since Fox News host Glenn Beck has come on the scene, he has been a thorn in the side of the left-wing machine.

But his July 28 "Fox & Friends" criticism of President Barack Obama's comments on the racially-charged Cambridge, Mass. incident in which a local policeman arrested Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. has sent the liberal nutroots over the edge. After left-wing storefronts drew attention to Beck's analysis, groups want to viewers to boycott his sponsors.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

"Beck's wildly offensive charge, spurred by the recent controversy over the arrest of Henry Louis Gates, Jr., was the latest low in a longstanding conservative narrative that ludicrously paints white men as the victims of ‘reverse racism' and oppression by minorities. Beck's egregious attack has prompted Color of Change to launch a campaign urging Beck's advertisers - which include GEICO and Proctor & Gamble - to stop sponsoring the shock jock's divisive hate-mongering," Tana Ganeva wrote for the liberal Web site Alternet on Aug. 3. "It's about time."

Good luck with that. Beck's latest book, "Common Sense: The Case Against an Out-of-Control Government, Inspired by Thomas Paine," has dominated The New York Times bestsellers list for seven weeks now. He has a wildly popular TV show and a top-5 radio talk show. Boycotting Beck's advertisers will be easier said than done. In fact, it could backfire and solidify fan support for him.

But the campaign launched by Color of Change, a non-profit organization that "exists to strengthen Black America's political voice" isn't an actual boycott, but a plea for people to fill-out a Web form that is set up to send an e-mail to Beck's advertisers.

The left has made efforts to boycott other conservative pundits in the past, including, repeatedly, Rush Limbaugh. Those were so successful that Limbaugh signed a deal reportedly worth $400 million last year.

Obama confesses to being socialist

2009-07-31T20:11:00.000-07:00

Ronald Reagan Exposes Obama's Healthcare Scam

2009-07-30T18:26:00.001-07:00

Jerusalem Protesting Barack Obama

2009-07-28T18:34:00.001-07:00

The Chains that Bind-Liberal Uncle Tom Menality

2009-07-26T20:56:00.000-07:00

Has slavery really been eradicated? I mean has African Americans become a free people?.In the context of our society you could say,that many Americans died to make all people free.Brother against brother fighting each for what they thought was the right.But did that great war with the heaviest casualties ever amassed in American History,really eradicate the true definition of slavery?I really don't believe it did.
As to date 13 million black babies since 1973 in this Country-Minority women constitute only about 13% of the female population (age 15-44) in the United States, but they underwent approximately 36% of the abortions.

According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, black women are more than 5 times as likely as white women to have an abortion

On average, 1,876 black babies are aborted every day in the United States.

This is genocide,perpetrated against a minority group -one that was under the understanding that they were a free people. But their offspring is being eradicated by a group founded by a racist Margaret Sanger.This woman would give speeches to the klu klux klan and she believed in Eugenics a system of ridding society of the "unfit" an "undesirable".
This was a technique also employed by Adolf Hitler and his "extermination" of the Jews. While Planned Parenthood's current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as "Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics" (June 1920), "The Eugenic Conscience" (February 1921), "The purpose of Eugenics" (December 1924), "Birth Control and Positive Eugenics" (July 1925), "Birth Control: The True Eugenics" (August 1928), and many others.

Does this sound like freedom-It sounds like that if you put a different face on the same evil, it becomes good?No way-This is a lie that just keeps getting more and more credible.While all the time, all it can be called is "incredible".This is acceptable?I really hope it isn't!The lie has to be exposed.The fact that genocide is happening and seemingly the Party-Democrats ,don't care!Why is that?They tell the minorities "we are in there fighting for you,getting you what you deserve"and all the time their babies are not given value or purpose.The liberals make the minorities think they are have to have them to succeed or not succeed.It is a vicious cycle that has to be stopped.
The Marriage rate for African Americans has dropped since the 1960's around the same time the Democratic Party convinced this demographic that they were in their corner.The broken families that have resulted since this period is astronomical. In the 1940'a African American divorce rate was about the same as whites.Around 22%.Liberal agenda involves destroying the traditional family structure. One,Planned parenthood.Had and does promote promiscuity,no value to life.Two trying to obscure the lines of what constitutes a family structure,ie-gay,homosexual,agenda for an acceptable marriage arrangement and environmental family.
First, African Americans are told "we don't value your offspring" and that we are going to use your enormous struggle in this Country "slavery" "civil rights" to piggyback our other agendas by saying that being gay is like being black!!Are you serious? I am personally disturbed that there is not more of an outrage in the Black Community.Can I say it is an Uncle Tom mentality?Well that is how I feel about it .
The majority of the African American Community feel they are "beholden" to the Uncle Tom's ie- Liberals for bringing them so far!What? They didn't do anything that Martin Luther King Jr. didn't do. He wanted "Civil Rights" and he wanted it 'clean'.Not the dirty way it has arrived!! There was no beholden when it came to Martin Luther King jr. He knew that his dream would be realized!But it was tainted,because he was taken! The Liberals got credit for what wasn't theirs.History warped and distorted the facts,and now we stand with African Americans being enslaved once again,by the same Party that didn't want the Civil Rights Amendment passed.Democrats.Robert Byrd WV.Head of the klu klux klan. It is a joke that isn't funny.
The slavery that exists today in our Country is not one that can be seen by chains that shackle the legs,but in the chains that Liberals keep tightening with the control that they wield and the fear that they instill.It is one of cruelty and shame.It is of unthinkable misery.They actual promote the lie that Democrats are going to get blacks jobs by "leveling the playing"field.Wait red lights- translation "We don't value enough so we have to make the system ,so..you can compete" How demeaning is that? ..and it is the truth.They degrade in every action and it is praised.Or the lie that says "will will subsidize housing and you can get a boost up" Oh yeah this one has worked out horribly.The "projects" how they are referred, are full of fear from crime,drugs and poor living conditions.Oh that boost up is really a boost out.Not valuing a person is telling them that can't compete or succeed without giving them a handout,a handout that is proven to kill the spirit and discourage the soul!
The vote is a powerful tool and if the Liberal can control this massive demographic with lies,and deceit their larger agenda can be accomplished.It hurts the heart to think that a group in America can wield such dangerous power of our African American citizens and if we speak of such things, we are told we are racist.
How is it racist to stop the killing of over eighteen hundred black babies aday?How is it racist to tell someone that your are of equal value with every other human being?You can do anything you work hard and put your mind too.That you don't need me or any other group to propel you anywhere,you can do anything in America.How is it racist to say that being a homosexual does not come to the level at all,of the Civil Rights Movement?How is it racist to want African American fathers to stay at home and raise their children?How is it racist to understand and admire the work of Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.,because he said to judge a man on the content of his character?How is it racist to fight against the injustice that is what the Democratic Party is leveling on the minorities in this Country?
This is America and it is so sad to see a Country that lost 620,000 men died by 1865 to free a people from the slave masters that controlled their destinies.
Why do we taint that blood that spilled for such a noble cause,to sit and watch a second enslavement and sit in silence.I will not sit in silence and hope every good and fair minded America will not bow down to the Liberal Agenda!!They hurt in the guise of help.Their lies must be exposed, the division that they wield as something they want to rid the World of,is in reality their ticket to anything they want.As that division widens they blame the conservatives.
In fact, they wield the sword of division proudly-it is their power.They can say "look they want to hold you back ,we want to help you" the Liberals words drip with deciet and pure evil.They speak of themselves,they want to hold back, and their help is guised in dependence.
NO American is beholden to anyone,and if you are and the "beholder" does not realease you from that thought-they are slavemasters, that don't value your worth as a human being!!

Britain is Bankcrupt

2009-07-24T17:51:00.000-07:00

America Better Wake-Up

2009-07-22T11:19:00.000-07:00

Today in the Jerusalem Post it is reporting that the US is saying to "premature"for them to impose sanctions on Israel.What is going on here?Is this the bully administration of America attacking a little Country (Israel)when they all ready sit amongst ravenous wolves!!This is so incredible,America when will you wake up out of your messiah induced haze and see where this Administation is taking us.Israel has been our biggest ally in the Middle East.The only real ally really!!Now our President of "change" wants to flip the world on it's ear and favor the Arabs!!Who attacked us on 9/11? It was not Jews,it was muslims.Our Government acts as if they don't know what is taught out of the Koran.They know.Jihad is taught and hate againts Jews and non-muslims.That is why you must be informed.Read the Koran.Tell your friends to read it.Your eyes will be opened.This is truly a sad day in American History!
Really need to go out and buy Saul Alinskys book "Rules for Radicals" and see the playbook that this Administration is using.This is Israel of the Bible.Israel that God gave this land to.There wasn't even a Palestian State until very recent.The UN gave this land back to a battered people and this is how the USA repays these people of God!!I am disheartened for America, then I know that God is Sovereign and he will have the last word.In our infinite wisdom (which is very limited by God's measure) we cannot know what lies ahead.
We are praying for America and Israel and know that we cannot support our Government in these attacks on Israel!!

P.S In Deerborn Michigan last week,the Islamic Festival was held.Christians were not allowed to come near them with litature and if they tried they were hit and ran off.This is America this is not Islam.Read it-http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,534301,00.html- The Sharia Law is all ready being ignored!!They call that tolerance-but watch the video tolerance is a one way street!!

Obama won't admit US won Cold War

2009-07-20T20:37:00.000-07:00

Is our Economy really in Recovery?

2009-07-17T09:19:00.000-07:00

Peter Schiff will Run for Senate if enough Money Raised

2009-07-16T07:38:00.000-07:00

The worldwide economic collapse...is not here yet!

2009-07-14T12:36:00.000-07:00

J. James Estrada has been commenting on all the right things in politics since joining the Republican party during the years of the Reagan Administration.

The worldwide economic collapse...is not here yet!
July 14, 11:18 AM

Barney FrankBernie Madoff begins his federal prison sentence today. That’s good. Madoff ripped off a multitude of investors to the tune of $50 billion. He was found guilty of his crimes in court and he will now pay by spending the rest of his life behind cold steel bars. Again, that’s good. And what’s good for Madoff should be good for the perpetrators of the sub-prime lending mess. So why are Barney Frank and Chris Dodd still in Congress?

Back in the 1990’s, Frank, Dodd, and a host of others within the Clinton administration, set off this ticking time-bomb by forcing banks to make loans to those they would not ordinarily loan. That is, to those who could not pay the loans back. The politicians, through their experiment in social engineering, rolled a moneymaker down Wall Street and the money guys went along for the big bucks. Well, the buck has stopped here.

With the election of President Obama, America was set to punish those who caused this financial crisis. However, instead, America has set a knife to the neck of its wounded body, not realizing that they have empowered the enablers.

Al Queda tried to place the country in this peril with the 9/11 attacks. But the Bush tax cuts caused a swift recovery to occur. Remember that the Dow reached over 14,000 in Bush’s second term? True, Bush was duped in 2008 with “bailout” fever, but the genesis of the economic landslide began during the heady days under Clinton.

As Bush proved, as did Reagan before him, the remedy to economic malaise is government getting out of the way of American ingenuity. Obama, though, is not getting government out of the way. He is setting government squarely in the way and building a dam to hold back recovery. In this way, he is not “wasting a good crisis,” and is moving to reshape America into a socialist’s paradise. But America will not be held back. A flood is coming that will smash the hopes of the comrades building this foolish bridge to the old Soviet Union.

If the flood does not come, then you will see a real worldwide economic collapse.

Water cut off from City California-Economic Collapse

2009-07-13T11:54:00.000-07:00

Economic Collapse for Dummies 2009

2009-07-11T07:42:00.001-07:00

Obamageddon-Economic Collapse

2009-07-07T18:22:00.000-07:00

Ever Present Media Bias

2009-07-07T18:21:00.001-07:00

The Ever Present (Liberal) Media Bias
June 16, 3:22 PM Patrick McMahon
One of the most complex topics in American politics today is media bias. Yes it does exist on widespread level. Now being a political commentator or expressing your opinion, like I am doing right now, is not what I am referring to. I am talking about the “objective” news organizations that are supposed to report the news in an unbiased way, or just present the facts. The truth is that the vast majority of them do not do that anymore and that is resulting in a soaring number of people either being fed biased information or they are turning to more unconventional means of getting their news.

Most people know that the bias in news overwhelmingly is in favor of the Democratic Party, as it has been for many years now. That is not to say that there is not a Republican bias at all, but it is heavily outnumbered by the many liberal leaning news outlets. With the exception of Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, the Washington Times, and the political commentators in talk radio being sympathetic to the Republican Party; the rest appear to be favorable of the Democratic Party. The worst examples of this are the New York Times, the Washington Post, and MSNBC. They have been completely over the top in their support for President Obama and Democrats in Congress. CNN has a slight Democratic tilt, but no where near what it has been on MS-Obama…. I mean MSNBC. Liberal bias has not been working as was hoped, since the Democratic leaning news outlets are absolutely hemorrhaging viewers and readers. MSNBC is so far behind Fox News in the ratings it is pitiful. Not to mention the New York Times is facing a financial meltdown because their circulation has been steadily dropping. A horrible instance of media bias is just today ABC News announced that they were giving President Obama an entire evening of free programming to explain his healthcare plan and to make the case for it. There are two BIG problems with this. One, it is not being paid and two, Republicans and opponents of the plan are not being included. Does anyone actually think the media would have done the same for a Republican? I think not.

It is high time for media bias to go away. Both sides should have their points fairly heard by the audience, which are the voters. They should be allowed to make up their minds about what issues they agree with or disagree with. The press has often treated the public as sheep that need to be herded around and told what to think. Well, Americans are smarter than that and are able to form their own opinions without having a loud mouth television reporter tell a twisted lie in order for people to support a program. If this trend does not stop soon, people will keep turning to other methods of receiving objectionable news instead of being shoveled the same old thing.

God and Country organizers: Pentagon denied flyover

2009-07-03T17:41:00.000-07:00

God and Country organizers: Pentagon denied flyover
Bryan Dooley
bdooley@idahopress.com

NAMPA - Organizers of the God and Country Family Festival say the Pentagon denied a military flyover, which the celebration has featured for 42 years, because of the event's emphasis on Christianity.

"Basically, we applied to have a military flyover," Director Patti Syme told the Idaho Press-Tribune Thursday. "We were given (Federal Aviation Administration) approval, and then had to apply through the Pentagon. When we applied they denied our request because, as the gentlemen stated, our Web site specifically stated that this is a Christian event."

The Pentagon did not respond to a request for comment submitted to its media office Thursday evening.

Organizers don't deny the explicitly Christian nature of the annual patriotic rally.

"Yes, it's about as Christian as you can get - we believe in promoting Christianity," Syme said. "And we have no plans to change that."

But Canyon County Commissioner David Ferdinand, the festival board's media contact, said that's not all there is to it.

"It's God and country, and that's the military and all of that," Ferdinand stressed. "You do the flyover to honor the military and the freedoms that they stand for. To me, we're honoring the military when we do that flyover, and that's why we do it. I think they made a bad decision."

Organizers will push to bring the flyover back next year, Ferdinand said.

"The military and the families who have sacrificed their loved ones for this country and for those freedoms deserve to have that flyover," he said.

Ferdinand said it was unclear why, after 42 years, the Pentagon did not approve the flyover this year.

"It's like the guy got on our Web site for a minute and just looked at that one thing," he said.

He said Syme told him the Pentagon representative she spoke with was very understanding and said the military would love to participate but could not do so because of the explicit endorsements of Christianity.

Syme's husband Scott Syme, a veteran of the U.S. Army Reserve who served in both Iraq and Afghanistan, ran for U.S. Senate in 2008.

Christian activist Brandi Swindell sent a text message about the lack of the flyover from Wednesday night's event at the Idaho Center amphitheater. She followed up with another message Thursday.

"This is unbelievable and deeply troubling," Swindell wrote. "The Pentagon does not have the authority to discriminate against Christian groups or events. This type of religious bigotry is unconstitutional. How sad to see this lack of respect and level of blatant bias surrounding the 4th of July celebration."

Pam Baldwin, executive director of the Interfaith Alliance of Idaho, said there's no basis for the assertion that the denial amounted to federal government discrimination against Christians.

"Everything is not about whether folks are Jews or Christians or Muslims," she said. "If people are saying that, they're probably looking for media attention or looking to disparage other faiths."

Baldwin questioned whether a flyover of the event would have been a prudent use of public resources, especially in light of the deep recession.

Lou Dobbs-Hate Crimes going down -not up

2009-07-03T06:17:00.002-07:00

Hate Crimes Episode 1

2009-07-03T06:17:00.001-07:00

Gerald Celente-The dollar will be worthless

2009-07-02T07:25:00.001-07:00

Cap and Trade:Energy TAX -Obama says

2009-06-29T13:03:00.000-07:00

Cap and Trade Nightmare

2009-06-29T13:00:00.000-07:00

Coming World Economic Collapse

2009-06-27T09:04:00.000-07:00

Peter Schiff-Bernake leading us into Inflation!!

2009-06-26T19:36:00.000-07:00

Obama's Health Care-His Thoughts

2009-06-26T11:12:00.001-07:00

Big Job Losses Coming

2009-06-26T09:00:00.000-07:00

Peter Schiff-What is Going on in the Economy!!

2009-06-25T20:56:00.000-07:00

Abolish World Bank and IMF

2009-06-23T09:37:00.000-07:00

Economic Collapse of 2009 September?

2009-06-22T07:57:00.001-07:00

Economic Collapse of 2009

2009-06-20T21:27:00.000-07:00

Inflation Fears

2009-06-17T17:21:00.001-07:00

Government Bluffs,Dollar Weakens,Inflation

2009-06-17T17:01:00.000-07:00

Hyperinflation now Guarenteed

2009-06-17T16:57:00.000-07:00

Depression Unavoidable

2009-06-17T16:50:00.000-07:00

Dick Morris "Their Right,Not Crazies" NWO

2009-06-16T08:00:00.000-07:00

Geithner "His Own Words"

2009-06-15T18:05:00.001-07:00

THE GOVERNMENT HAS TO BE WILLING TO SPEND? Crazy!!!Is this Common Sense?

Geithner "His Own Words"

2009-06-15T18:05:00.000-07:00

THE GOVERNMENT HAS TO BE WILLING TO SPEND? Crazy!!!Is this Common Sense?

Worst Economic Collapse Ever

2009-06-14T08:00:00.000-07:00

Jewish Paper-"We're launching a Campaign against anti-Semitic Obama

2009-06-13T16:06:00.000-07:00

i

Last update - 22:53 03/06/2009

'We're launching a campaign against anti-Semitic Obama'

By Raphael Ahren, Haaretz Correspondent and Haaretz Sevice

Tags: Israel news, Obama, Jerusalem

Some 130 protesters gathered in front of the American Consulate in Jerusalem Wednesday afternoon to rally against U.S. President Barack Obama, who had just launched his Middle East tour, during which he is expected to reach out in friendship to the Muslim world.

As more than a dozen local and international journalists looked on, the protesters chanted "No, You Can't" and waved posters saying "20 new 'settlements' by 2010 - Yes We Can!"

Far right activist Itamar Ben-Gvir, who attended the protest, told Channel 10 that "it appears that we've arrived at a red line, which has already been crossed by the most anti-Semitic American president."
Advertisement

"We are launching a campaign against Barack Hussein Obama. He is bad for the people of Israel and for the state of Israel and his policies could bring about disaster. We expect our prime minister to say 'no' to anyone who tries to harm us," Ben-Gvir added.

National Union MKs Aryeh Eldad and Michael Ben Ari addressed the crowd, largely made up of native-English speaking Israelis.

"I'm here to tell Obama that Eretz Yisrael belongs to the Jewish people," said Scottish-born Edith Ognall, who drove to the capital from her hometown of Netanya to attend the event. "What right does anybody have to tell us to stop building in the land that was given to us by God? I'm not going to stand by and let Obama, or anybody else, tell me where I can live and where I can't live."

Nadia Matar, the Belgian-born co-chair of Women in Green, which organized the event, made a point of repeatedly mentioning Obama' middle name, Hussein, because "we have to remind ourselves that he received an Islamic education in Indonesia."

"We are connected to our land like a mother is connected to her children," the well-known activist told reporters. "And I want to warn you: Don't mess with a Jewish mother who feels her children or her homeland are in danger. Every part and parcel and hilltop and stone in the Land of Israel is like one of our children. And we'e going to protect it like lionesses."

The Greatest Depression-Economic Collapse

2009-06-12T20:55:00.000-07:00

Parker: Obama fast tracking the nanny state

2009-06-12T13:14:00.000-07:00

Submitted by SHNS on Fri, 06/12/2009 - 12:29. By STAR PARKER, Scripps Howard News Service editorials and opinion
President Obama wants health care reform this year.

He said at a town hall meeting the other day that he won't tolerate "endless delay" and that we probably won't reform health care if we don't do it this year.

Now why is that Mr. President? Will Congress be on vacation for the remaining three years of your term?

Consider that it's not unusual to take a full session of congress -- two years -- to pass legislation a fraction of the size and consequence of health care reform. Yet our president is demanding that a bill to overhaul a $2.5 trillion sector of our economy -- one sixth of it -- be considered and passed in a few short weeks.

It ought to be clear that this is not about taking an honest and sincere look at how to make this a better country and how to do a better job at delivering health care to Americans. It's impossible to look at something this massive and deal with it in such a short time frame.

This is about raw politics. When Mr. Obama says that if we don't get "it" done this year we probably won't get "it" done, he doesn't mean reforming health care. He means reforming it the way he and Ted Kennedy want to do it. Government run, nanny state health care.

To pull it off, they have to move fast.

First, the White House knows that Mr. Obama's honeymoon won't last forever. While his personal approval ratings remain high at 60 percent, his disapproval rating now at 33% is almost twice where is stood last February. And, in latest Gallup polling, the majority now disapprove of how Obama is handling government spending. So the White House wants action now on health care while their man is still popular.

Second, the White House knows that next year is an election year. It will be far more difficult to get Senators and Congressmen to play ball.

Third, they know that the big reason that Hillary Care failed in 1993 was that the American people were given an opportunity to look at it and consider it. They don't want to make the same mistake of giving voters a chance to actually understand what is about to happen to them. They know that the more Americans have an opportunity to take a look at the bureaucrat run, nanny state health care freight train, the more likely they will jump of the track.

Breathlessness is a great political technique. Telling voters that the world will end if we don't get X passed now.

This is how the $800 billion dollar "stimulus" bill got passed earlier this year. We were flashed images of the Great Depression of the 1930's and told our only hope is the stimulus bill.

Now, three months later, it's clear that our current economy bears no resemblance to the 1930's, that signs of recovery are emerging, and thus far only 6 percent of the $800 billion "stimulus" pot of political lard has been spent.

The trillions in new debt have been piled up at such a dizzying pace in the last few months Americans are numb. The federal government take from our economy has jumped from one fifth of it to one fourth.

Now, Mr. Obama and his Democrat colleagues want to layer on a new government health care plan to "compete" with private plans. "Compete" means raising taxes a few trillion dollars to provide subsidized insurance, and in some cases, free insurance, through a government plan in which all Americans will eventually wind up. And putting federal bureaucrats in charge of approving what health care procedures we are permitted.

The health care nanny state freight train is moving. Will we wake up before it's too late?

(Star Parker an author and president of CURE, Coalition for Urban Renewal and Education (www.urbancure.org). She can be reached at parker@urbancure.org.)

(Distributed by Scripps Howard News Service, http://www.scrippsnews.com)

COLUMN

They Done Us Wrong: Spending Our Way Into Greater Depression

2009-06-12T13:13:00.001-07:00

by Michael S. Rozeff

If you like economic depression, Obama is your man. The stock market is shouting this message loudly and clearly. The S & P 500 (measured by the security SPY) made a little high at 100.41 on November 4, 2008. The election was the next day. It has been downhill ever since. The close on March 2, 2009 was 70.60. This 30 percent decline qualifies as what used to be an ordinary bear market!

Congress and the President could not construct better measures, proposed and enacted, to deepen this depression if they tried. Congressional Democrats intend to ensconce Democrats as the majority party for the next 25 years or so. Their chosen method is wasteful pork sold as rational investment. But by gilding the nests of their chosen constituencies and supporters with huge taxpayer-funded giveaways, they will deepen and lengthen the depression.

The stock market tells us this, but it is easy for stimulus supporters to explain away the stock market�s drop in other ways. Obama supporters are likely to extol the good things that his program is doing to revive spending in the economy, and to regard the stock market as an aberrant den of gamblers and thieves who deserve their Bush-induced fate.

Very few men on the street, including my doctor, understand that spending, whether private or government, does not get rid of economic depression; and the lack of spending does not cause it. They do not fathom that government spending, borrowing, and taxing will further gash the sinking economy below the water line and send it to its watery grave. They are more inclined to believe, along with prominent economists, that government spending should be increased by trillions more. There cannot be too much of a good thing.

People automatically think that if everyone does not spend, then how can businesses keep going and hire people? How can the economy work? Then they think, if people only have money, then they can spend. If the government spending will only put that money into their hands, this will cause people to spend. It will jump start the economy, restore business confidence, and all will be well.

This story has a firm hold on the public imagination, but things don�t work that way. People in the aggregate can only earn money to spend by working productively. Money still doesn�t grow on trees.

The government doesn�t have a money tree either. Without resorting to inflation, it can only shift money around. America�s federal government is a group of Americans who are empowered to tax the rest of us and borrow from anyone in the world. This money is collected from you, me, and others. We then have less to spend. Shifting money from the left pocket to the right pocket doesn�t enhance the total amount.

Americans are not unwise enough to accept government money that is rolled off a printing press with absolutely nothing to back it up. Our government does not do things so crudely. Its money is printed up for it only after it issues government bonds that promise to pay interest. For all practical purposes, these bonds are perpetuities on which the promise is made to pay interest forever. There is no government money tree in this process because the government taxes Americans to pay the interest. If the government borrows from us and spends more now, we have less to spend now. The money goes from one pocket to another with no aggregate gain.

The government has another way to borrow. The central bank (the FED) can take the bonds and credit the government�s bank account. This exchanges one credit for another credit. The taxpayer must still pay interest. The credit created for the government has not directly diminished the taxpayer�s wealth on his personal account. There has been no money transferred from taxpayer to government. The taxpayers have a new liability, nonetheless. They will be made to pay the present value of the interest payments, which is the value of the bonds. This may or may not crimp their spending. It probably will not. They are unlikely at first to realize that they owe this money. As time goes on and they have to pay higher taxes, they might realize it. When the government relieves many people of direct taxes, it hides this burden of the debt for as long as it can.

So what do we have? The government can get money from the FED and spend it. It will seem to many people like money that grows on trees because they do not see the eventual taxes or the current hidden taxes. The government can spend this money. It will stimulate people into working at various government-selected projects. There is, however, no such thing as a free lunch. If people do not value these projects (which is usually the case) or the projects lose money (which they usually do), the welfare of people does not go up. It goes down, for they are paying for useless work. Furthermore, the government spending raises costs and prices by bidding labor and materials away from others. And this prevents those prices from adjusting to levels that make it profitable for businesses to employ people in making stuff that people really want.

There are those who contest the notion that government spending is largely waste. They imagine brand new bridges, newly-paved roads, and intercity rail transport. Even if these projects paid off, they are a tiny fraction of all government spending. And most of these do not pay off. Government spending only creates wealth if it spends money on things whose return exceeds the cost of the capital used. The government�s own operating costs are so high that, viewed as a business, it gets a return on its investments that falls far short of its capital costs. In other words, the government is like a gigantic money-losing business. One reason for this is that interest groups get the money. The image of public-minded officials dispersing the money efficiently is unreal.

Everyone who has spent any time at all looking into the matter of government spending, all regular readers of LRC, all readers of Ideas in Liberty, all readers of the publications of the Independent Institute, etc., and all those who have not looked into it, but have merely had experience with government, take it for granted that every $1 spent by government costs the taxpayer $1.25 or more. Governments routinely destroy wealth. The case is so overwhelming that anyone who believes otherwise can only be willfully ignorant or blinding himself. One scholar (Martin J. Bailey), who was far from a radical anti-government person, but who spent many years studying government and trying to write an improved Constitution to mitigate problems with representative government, wrote as follows:

"The leader, if truly well-informed, will know about several barriers to sound government. We may summarize these as follows. In existing nations the clash of interests often has powerfully wasteful and detrimental effects, among other reasons because elected professional politicians with almost unlimited authority to enact and administer laws are subject to enormous rent-seeking pressures. Indeed, they seek out groups that have been unable to solve their own organizational free rider problems and solve them through legislation � e.g., for labor in the 1930s through the National Labor Relations Act and more recently for the poor and the �homeless.� Political discourse in all venues is routinely filled with fraudulent claims, slander and other misrepresentations. Even if they might wish to enact perfectly constructive, statesmanlike legislation, politicians have no reliable conduit with which to collect valid information about the preferences and values of their constituents. A fundamental reason for these symptoms is that citizens have no incentive to seek out the truth on public issues, but instead choose rational ignorance and, often, rational non-participation. See Downs (1957: 238�274). From this core problem emanate others that permeate government. Finding a corrective mechanism for this core problem is a necessary condition for overall improvement."

It helps the cause of liberty when polite and well-mannered experts, people who have studied the matter for years and speak in restrained tones, inform us that politicians cater to interest groups and not the public welfare, that they routinely lie, that they organize interest groups and shake them down, that even if they wanted to, they could not serve the public interest, and that our representative government is wildly dysfunctional.

The image of government restoring confidence by raising and spending money could not be more mistaken. This is the fantasy of Keynes. It is the rhetoric of FDR ("the only thing we have to fear is fear itself"). If business confidence depended on government spending, there would not have occurred any of the last 5 recessions in the U.S., for government spending rose both before and during these recessions. And there would have been a recession during the Clinton years when government spending moderated. The confidence of a businessman depends on the anticipated demand for his goods and services. He does not invest in plant and hire labor on the basis that the government is spending money on its favorite interest groups.

There are unemployed resources in a depression. Doesn�t the government improve matters by putting these to work? There is a large vacant building for lease in a nearby commercial strip. It used to be a shoe store. At the same time, there are unemployed men and women in the area. So far, no business has seen fit to rent the building. Does the government have a viable business in view? This is highly doubtful. It is not how the government operates. If it directly hires the building, the chances are that it will hire people to do make-work. The operation will run a loss, paid for by taxpayers. Why should they be taxed to pay the unemployed and lose money in the process? Nothing is accomplished but a transfer of wealth from taxpayers to the unemployed and an additional loss. Meanwhile, when business recovers and seeks to satisfy needs of consumers, it finds that its costs are higher because the government has rented the building and hired labor. The government�s actions inhibit recovery. Why should wealth be taken from taxpayers? If they would have spent the money on goods, they no longer can. If they would have invested it, that too is no longer possible.

Meanwhile, there is another effect of government borrowing from the FED. When the FED credits the government, it creates bank reserves. This typically sets off a multiple credit expansion among banks. This stimulates business, but it is a process of credit inflation that leads to a recession or worse. Ordinarily, business demand for labor and materials is constrained and rationed by the supply of savings. The FED�s credit creation, however, causes a lowering of the interest rate. That relaxes the constraint. The stimulation causes economic distortions and imbalances and eventual recession.

Imagine that IBM is induced to borrow and to produce a new supercomputer because it thinks that its cost of capital is lower. It hires people, builds a new production line, and starts churning out new supercomputers. Other businesses do the same. But their planned selling prices and costs are predicated on spending, saving, and hiring patterns that no longer exist � the credit inflation changes all of that. The business activity that comes into the economy affects particular people first and not others, and their spending and saving behavior is not what would have occurred had they not been employed and paid in this new activity. Furthermore, people change their economic behavior when they observe the activities of others and experience price changes.

The result is that somewhere along the way, some businesses find that their costs are rising beyond what they planned and expected. Some businesses also find that people are not buying the newly-produced items in the anticipated volume. The costs are rising because IBM is competing with Apple and many others to hire factors of production. Some products are not selling because the stimulus is uneven or not neutral in its effects. To sell their products, some firms have to lower their prices. Since they still have to pay their debts, they find themselves caught in a squeeze. This leads to cutbacks. This affects other firms. A recession or depression starts.

Government credit inflation is not a free lunch. The Obamaniacs are not overtly promising more depression via increased government spending, but that is inherent in their program. If they borrow from the public, it has no net stimulating effect. If they borrow from the FED, it produces temporary stimulation and inflation and then further depression. Credit creation through the central bank ultimately sends the economy on a downward course.

The stimulus story is that if people only can get money, they can spend and the economy will rise. People only can earn money by working. They earn money by providing something of value to others, like their labor or a good or service. The money they get entitles them to cash in on the value of their service by choosing to buy the goods or assets that others make available.

The image of money making the wheels of commerce turn is misleading. The money is a counter, a ticket that allows one to buy an array of goods. Money is a chit or a voucher. Money is a credit that can be cashed in against society�s goods and services; it is a credit that you can use up as you choose. When you make money, that money measures something else that is more basic, which is that you have supplied a valuable service or good. The money is an option to get goods in return at a later time and place of your choosing.

Money is not the problem. We do not have a depression for lack of money. The official M1 money supply at this time is almost $1.6 trillion. It was $1.4 trillion when the depression began. The problem is much more subtle. It has to do with prices and the price system. It has to do with overcoming problems caused by bad credits that arose when the price system was distorted by inflation. We have a depression because of the distortions and imbalances in the economy that arose over many years when too many people were induced by the FED to borrow too many credits and use them to buy and produce goods and services.

The image of government spending putting money into people�s hands is misleading. When the federal government spends money on windmills, it has to get that money from taxes or borrowing. When it borrows from the public, it has to raise taxes to pay the costs of the debt. So we may as well say that all the federal spending is paid for with taxes. This takes money out of the hands of those who might otherwise spend it or invest it. The government isn�t jump-starting anything.

If people want to trade goods and do not have enough money to carry out their exchanges, they can always create more. Money itself is not the problem, as the spending and stimulus story suggests. What you spend is what you produce. You can only spend what you produce. (If you borrow and spend, you must eventually pay that back with your production.) If Iowa corn farmers want to buy Chinese pots and pans, they have to produce corn. If the Chinese want to buy Iowa corn, they have to produce pots and pans. They don�t want our dollars to eat anymore than we want their yuan to cook with; these currencies are only media of exchange. We can always arrange means of paying each other. The real problem is that the production of goods has been dis-arranged and that many firms have to restructure. Many will go bankrupt and liquidate. Many will lay off workers. The adjustments take time. This is not now a problem of money and credit, although it was brought about by central banking�s excessive money and credit. It is now a problem of real production being interrupted because it is not geared to producing what people want to and can buy at current prices. When a lot of us do not have the means to spend, it is because we are not producing enough product that others want at prices they are willing to pay. That happens because inflation has distorted the price system and production.

In this situation, government spending does not restore the production system to one that caters to people�s wants and demands. Government spending does the opposite. It induces men and materials into work that is not in demand. This lengthens the period of adjustment back to normal production. It causes even more distortion by bidding labor and materials away from businesses and into lines of work promoted by government. It creates a new inflation and price distortions that must cause more depression. Furthermore, as we know, the government spending itself is on wasteful activities.

The government spending under Bush and Obama is piling up immense new liabilities and debts. Americans are trying to save more. The data on their private account show this clearly. The personal savings rate in January of this year is 5 percent. From 2005 to April of 2008, it averaged just under 0.5 percent. Meanwhile their government is frustrating their actions by incurring immense new debts.

Sadly, spending is not the end of the story of the Obama administration. Its tax and regulatory policies are equally destructive. It is certain that higher capital gains taxes, estate taxes, income taxes, and carbon taxes will provide new depressing effects on the American economy. The federal government�s projects now include a growing array of wealth-destroying investments that include AIG, Citigroup, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the auto industry, and other major banks.

Since the Democrat victory in November, the stock market has been discounting these negatives. It will continue to do so as long as these negatives continue and worsen. At present, the Obama administration is still serving up a daily diet of negative shocks to the economy and the stock market. It is frustrating the recuperative powers of Americans, just as it is frustrating their attempts to save and put the American house in order. If this is not an example of the evils of our federal government and of our form of representative constitutional government, I don�t know what is.

Reverend Wright -Anti-Semite

2009-06-12T08:00:00.000-07:00

Distinct Differences Obama Comments on Terror

2009-06-10T17:07:00.000-07:00

Each of the following statements were made after murderous events.Notice the difference in his statements and the Politics that surround them.THINK-

Following the murder of Private Long, in front of Recruting Station in Little Rock Ark.

“I am deeply saddened by this senseless act of violence against two brave young soldiers who were doing their part to strengthen our armed forces and keep our country safe. I would like to wish Quinton Ezeagwula a speedy recovery, and to offer my condolences and prayers to William Long’s family as they mourn the loss of their son.”

Following the murder of Dr.Tiller-Late Term Abortionist

I am shocked and outraged by the murder of Dr. George Tiller as he attended church services this morning. However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence.

This Statement following the shooting at Holocaust Museum

“I am shocked and saddened by today’s shooting at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. This outrageous act reminds us that we must remain vigilant against anti-Semitism and prejudice in all its forms. No American institution is more important to this effort than the Holocaust Museum, and no act of violence will diminish our determination to honor those who were lost by building a more peaceful and tolerant world.

“Today, we have lost a courageous security guard who stood watch at this place of solemn remembrance. My thoughts and prayers are with his family and friends in this painful time.”

Do you see what outrages him and what saddens him?Do you see the priorities here?This is very disturbing-it is incredible!!We had a Radical Muslim shoot a Private-didn't call it Terriosim. Which it clearly was!!His outrage is sorely misplaced and can give you a window into the mind of Radical Liberalism!!Is this Empathy?

Rev.Wright "Them Jews keep me from Obam"

2009-06-10T15:58:00.000-07:00

Rush-Obama destroying Economy

2009-06-10T15:47:00.001-07:00

Barney Frank "Car Czar Award"

2009-06-09T08:00:00.000-07:00

Barney Frank gets "Car Czar" award
By: Susan Ferrechio
Chief Congressional Correspondent
06/08/09 5:51 PM EDT
Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., took to the Senate floor today to sarcastically issue a "car czar award" to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., for blocking an automotive warehouse from closing in in is district.
Frank said he was just working on behalf of his constituents, as any representative would, according to the Wall Street Journal, but Frank is no ordinary lawmaker. He's chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, which is playing a key role in the restructuring of the automotive industry. The Journal reports that Frank's efforts to keep the General Motors distribution center from closing at the end of the year were successful, and it saved 90 jobs. The Journal reports that Frank put in a call to GM CEO Fritz Henderson and the paper labeled him a "car czar" in a June 5 editorial.
Alexander says he is picking up from where the Journal left off.
"This is the first in a series of Car Czar awards to be conferred upon Washington meddlers who distinguish themselves by making it harder for the auto companies your government owns to compete in the world marketplace," Alexander said.
Alexander is apparently serious about bestowing more awards in the future and is seeking public suggestions for who should be honored.
"Please e-mail me at CarAward@Alexander.Senate.gov, and I will give you full credit in my regular Car Czar reports here on the floor of the United States Senate," Alexander said.

Ron Paul-Surreal

2009-06-05T15:46:00.000-07:00

The Daily Kos-GARBAGE

2009-06-01T11:03:00.000-07:00

The Daily Kos thinks it is a legitimate conversation forum!! But that is only because they only look through the Prism of Left Wing Extremism!!!They Applaud the President in his "Bully Pulpit" or teleprompter.Who was associated with some of the most extremist people in this Country. Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers and so many more...And then they will call the people who want to get back to the Values this Country was founded on...dumb!! These people employ a classic Goebble technique(he was the propaganda guy for Hitler) where if they repeat a lie enough it will be believed as the truth.
First of all, the Murder of the Abortion Doctor-Tiller.Horrible,unthinkable and not Representative of anti-Abortionist everywhere.But this is a tag that the Kos and other hateful, despicable groups will try to do, in an effort to drown out the effectiveness of the Pro-life movement,reflected in recent polls!!

Why would level headed people with a true conviction not to take innocent human life condone such a horrible act?They wouldn't! And I will add that the man that killed him needs to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law!! Do not in the least agree with what that man was doing,but we are not God and we do not make such decisions.Just as we believe to fight for the innocent unborn, they have not be tried and convicted of any Crime but they still die everyday!!We do see the madness-just as Dr.Tillers heart was stopped in the terrible crime by murder, every time a baby is aborted their hearts are stopped!! So why is it that we may justify the stopping of one heart and not the other!!Prayer has been said for the Tiller family and upset when we hear of senseless murder.And Prayer has been said for up to 4000 babies that will have their hearts stop today,also!! God is not a respecter of persons young,old,rich,poor, life is precious -

2009-05-30T21:02:00.001-07:00

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FROM WND'S JERSALEM, BUREAU
Obama promises Arabs Jerusalem will be theirs
Official: President said Palestinian state with holy city capital 'in American interest'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: May 30, 2009
5:39 pm Eastern

By Aaron Klein
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Jerusalem

JERUSALEM – President Obama and his administration told Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas during a meeting last week the U.S. foresees the creation of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital, according to a top PA official speaking to WND.

"The American administration was very friendly to the position of the PA," said Nimer Hamad, Abbas' senior political adviser.

"Abu Mazen (Abbas) heard from Obama and his administration in a very categorical way that a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital is in the American national and security interest," Hamad said.

Read the groundbreaking work that exposes the threats to Israel from within and without in Aaron Klein's "The Late, Great State of Israel" from WND Books.

Another PA official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told WND today that Obama informed Abbas he would not let Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "get in the way" of normalizing U.S. relations with the Arab and greater Muslim world.

"We were told from this new administration they will not allow a Netanyahu government to hurt their efforts of rehabilitating U.S. relations with the Arab and Islamic world, which is a high priority of Obama," the official said, speaking during a visit to Cairo.

(Story continues below)

Also in Cairo today, Abbas met with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, where the Palestinian leader briefed Egypt's president on his recent trip to Washington, saying the U.S. was committed to bringing about an end to Israeli construction in the West Bank.

Hamad's comments about Jerusalem today come as controversy abounded regarding the U.S. position on Israel's capital city.

Last week, the State Department refuted a speech in which Netanyahu said Jerusalem never will be divided.

"Jerusalem is Israel's capital," Netanyahu said at an event marking Jerusalem's reunification. "Jerusalem was always ours and will always be ours. It will never again be partitioned and divided."

In response, the State Department released a statement that Jerusalem "is a final status issue."

"Israel and the Palestinians have agreed to resolve its status during negotiations. We will support their efforts to reach agreements on all final status issues," the statement said.

Also last week, a top Palestinian Authority official claimed in a WND interview that the Obama administration told the PA that Jerusalem will never be united under Israeli sovereignty.

"Americans said an open Jerusalem – yes. But a united Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty – no," Hatem Abdel Khader, the PA's minister for Jerusalem affairs, said in comments to both WND and Israel's Ynetnews website.

"(The Obama administration) has made clear that Jerusalem must be accessible to everyone – but not united under Israel's rule," Khader said.

Khader claimed the U.S. is cooperating with the PA to "thwart Israel's plans in Jerusalem."

"When they collaborate with us in Israeli courts against home demolitions or the confiscation of land we see their attitude," he said.

Khader told WND, "The Americans are very present on the ground, and they are making pressure over Israeli authorities and even municipalities."

"They are acting according to the concept that the failure to establish a Palestinian state would jeopardize U.S. national security interests – and without Jerusalem there is no Palestinian state," he said.

U.S. helps Palestinians live illegally near Temple Mount

Khader's claim the U.S. is helping the Palestinians gain a foothold in Jerusalem is accurate. In April, WND reported that under intense American pressure and following a nearly unprecedented behind-the-scenes U.S. campaign, the Netanyahu government has decided not to bulldoze Palestinian homes built illegally on Jewish-owned property in Jerusalem.

The issue is critical since the 80 homes in question are located in Silwan, an eastern Jerusalem neighborhood close to the Temple Mount and Jerusalem's Old City that the Palestinians claim as a future capital. Jewish groups have been working to fortify the community's Jewish presence. Silwan is adjacent to the City of David, a massive archeological dig just outside the Temple Mount that is constantly turning up Temple artifacts.

Like tens of thousands of other Arab housing projects throughout eastern Jerusalem, the Palestinian homes in Silwan were illegally constructed on property long ago purchased by Jews. The Israeli government ordered the structures' legal demolition.

But during a visit here in early March, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton strongly protested the planned bulldozing.

"Clearly this kind of activity is unhelpful and not in keeping with the obligations entered into under the Road Map," she said. "It is an issue that we intend to raise with the government of Israel and the government at the municipal level in Jerusalem."

The Road Map calls for Israel to freeze Jewish settlement expansion in the West Bank but does not bar Israel from dismantling illegally constructed Palestinian homes in Jerusalem.

WND learned that in the weeks since Clinton's visit here, the U.S. mounted an intensive campaign lobbying the Israeli government against tearing down the illegal Palestinian homes in Silwan. The campaign included letters from the Middle East section of the State Department addressed to various Jerusalem municipalities, with copies of the letters sent to the offices of Israel's prime minister and foreign minister. The letters called on Israel to allow the illegal Palestinian homes in Silwan to remain and stated any demolitions would not foster an atmosphere of peace.

Also, in a follow-up visit here, State Department officials made it clear to their Israeli counterparts the U.S. opposes the Silwan bulldozing.

According to sources in the Israeli government, including in Netanyahu's administration, a decision has been made not to bulldoze the illegal Palestinian homes. The sources said the issue of the homes may be raised again in the future, but for the time being the houses will remain intact.

The sources attributed the decision against the bulldozing – which has not yet been announced – to the intense American campaign against the house demolitions.

Said one source in Netanyahu's administration, "This was very frustrating to us. Can you imagine if a foreign government came in and told a city office in the U.S. not to tear down a house that was illegally constructed on someone else's property?"

While Clinton opposed the Palestinian house demolitions, informed Israeli officials said the Obama administration is carefully monitoring Jewish construction in eastern Jerusalem and has already protested to the highest levels of Israeli government about evidence of housing expansion in those areas.

The officials, who spoke on condition that their names be withheld, said that last month Obama's Mideast envoy, George Mitchell, oversaw the establishment of an apparatus based in the U.S. consulate in Jerusalem that closely monitors eastern Jerusalem neighborhoods, incorporating regular tours on a daily basis.

The officials said that in recent meetings Mitchell strongly protested Jewish construction in eastern Jerusalem. Mitchell also condemned the work of nationalist Jewish groups to purchase property in Jerusalem's Old City, including in areas intimately tied to Judaism.

Israel recaptured eastern Jerusalem, including the Temple Mount – Judaism's holiest site – during the 1967 Six Day War.

The Palestinians, however, have claimed eastern Jerusalem as a future capital. About 244,000 Arabs live in Jerusalem, mostly in eastern neighborhoods, out of a total population of 724,000, the majority Jewish.

2009-05-29T08:25:00.000-07:00

Charges Against 'New Black Panthers' Dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
Three men were accused of trying to threaten voters and block poll and campaign workers by the threat of force -- one even brandishing what prosecutors call a deadly weapon.

FOXNews.com

Friday, May 29, 2009

Members of the New Black Panthers attend a rally outside the Lamar County Courthouse in Paris, Texas November 17, 2008.

Charges brought against three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense under the Bush administration have been dropped by the Obama Justice Department, FOX News has learned.

The charges stemmed from an incident at a Philadelphia polling place on Election Day 2008 when three members of the party were accused of trying to threaten voters and block poll and campaign workers by the threat of force -- one even brandishing what prosecutors call a deadly weapon.

The three black panthers, Minister King Samir Shabazz, Malik Zulu Shabazz and Jerry Jackson were charged in a civil complaint in the final days of the Bush administration with violating the voter rights act by using coercion, threats and intimidation. Shabazz allegedly held a nightstick or baton that prosecutors said he pointed at people and menacingly tapped it. Prosecutors also say he "supports racially motivated violence against non-blacks and Jews."

The Obama administration won the case last month, but moved to dismiss the charges on May 15.

Click here to see FOX News video from the scene on election day.

Click to watch the incident on YouTube.

The complaint says the men hurled racial slurs at both blacks and whites.

A poll watcher who provided an affidavit to prosecutors in the case noted that Bartle Bull, who worked as a civil rights lawyer in the south in the 1960's and is a former campaign manager for Robert Kennedy, said it was the most blatant form of voter intimidation he had ever seen.

In his affidavit, obtained by FOX News, Bull wrote "I watched the two uniformed men confront voters and attempt to intimidate voters. They were positioned in a location that forced every voter to pass in close proximity to them. The weapon was openly displayed and brandished in plain sight of voters."

He also said they tried to "interfere with the work of other poll observers ... whom the uniformed men apparently believed did not share their preferences politically," noting that one of the panthers turned toward the white poll observers and said "you are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker."

A spokesman for the Department of Justice told FOX News, "The Justice Department was successful in obtaining an injunction that prohibits the defendant who brandished a weapon outside a Philadelphia polling place from doing so again. Claims were dismissed against the other defendants based on a careful assessment of the facts and the law. The department is committed to the vigorous prosecution of those who intimidate, threaten or coerce anyone exercising his or her sacred right to vote."

FOX News' Eric Shawn contributed to this report.

Is Revelation being played out in the Mainstream News!

2009-05-26T18:48:00.000-07:00

The Obama Man Song

2009-05-25T10:27:00.001-07:00

The Alinsky Administration

2009-05-20T17:23:00.001-07:00

May 14, 2009, 4:00 a.m.

Today, reading Rules for Radicals is illuminating and worrisome.

By Jim Geraghty

Barack Obama never met Saul Alinsky, but the radical organizer’s thought helps explain a great deal about how the president operates.

Alinsky died in 1972, when Obama was 11 years old. But three of Obama’s mentors from his Chicago days studied at a school Alinsky founded, and they taught their students the philosophy and methods of one of the first “community organizers.” Ryan Lizza wrote a 6,500-word piece on Alinsky’s influence on Obama for The New Republic, noting, “On his campaign website, one can find a photo of Obama in a classroom teaching students Alinskian methods. He stands in front of a blackboard on which he has written ‘Relationships Built on Self Interest,’ an idea illustrated by a diagram of the flow of money from corporations to the mayor.”

In a letter to the Boston Globe, Alinsky’s son wrote that “the Democratic National Convention had all the elements of the perfectly organized event, Saul Alinsky style. . . . Barack Obama’s training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness. It is an amazingly powerful format, and the method of my late father always works to get the message out and get the supporters on board. When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well.”

As a tool for understanding the thinking of Obama, Alinsky’s most famous book, Rules for Radicals, is simultaneously edifying and worrisome. Some passages make Machiavelli’s Prince read like a Sesame Street picture book on manners.

After Obama took office, the pundit class found itself debating the ideology and sensibility of the new president — an indication of how scarcely the media had bothered to examine him beforehand. But after 100 days, few observers can say that Obama hasn’t surprised them with at least one call. Gays wonder why Obama won’t take a stand on gay marriage when state legislatures will. Union bosses wonder what happened to the man who sounded more protectionist than Hillary Clinton in the primary. Some liberals have been stunned by the serial about-faces on extraordinary rendition, indefinite detention without trial, military-tribunal trials, the state-secrets doctrine, and other policies they associate with the Bush administration. Former supporters of Obama, including David Brooks, Christopher Buckley, Jim Cramer, and Warren Buffett, have expressed varying degrees of criticism of his early moves, surprised that he is more hostile to the free market than they had thought.

Obama’s defenders would no doubt insist this is a reflection of his pragmatism, his willingness to eschew ideology to focus on what solutions work best. This view assumes that nominating Bill Richardson as commerce secretary, running up a $1.8 trillion deficit, approving the AIG bonuses, signing 9,000 earmarks into law, adopting Senator McCain’s idea of taxing health benefits, and giving U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown 25 DVDs that don’t work in Britain constitute “what works best.” Obama is a pragmatist, but a pragmatist as understood by Alinsky: One who applies pragmatism to achieving and keeping power.

One of Alinsky’s first lessons is: “Radicals must have a degree of control over the flow of events.” Setting aside the Right’s habitual complaint about the pliant liberal media, Obama has dominated the news by unveiling a new initiative or giving a major speech on almost every weekday of his presidency. There has been a steady stream of lighter stories as well — the puppy, Michelle Obama’s fashion sense, the White House swing set, the president and vice president’s burger lunch.

The constant parade of events large and small ensures that whenever unpleasant news arises and overtakes the desired message — think of Tom Daschle’s withdrawal, the Air Force One photo op, or North Korea’s missile launch — it leads the news for only a day. For contrast, consider what happened when the photos of the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse appeared: As American Journalism Review reports, they “dominated the headlines for a month. Day after day, top national newspapers brought to light new aspects of the debacle on their front pages.”

When Obama announced a paltry $100 million in budget cuts, and insisted this was part of a budget-trimming process that would add up to “real money,” he clearly understood that the public processes these numbers very differently from the way budget wonks do. Alinsky wrote: “The moment one gets into the area of $25 million and above, let alone a billion, the listener is completely out of touch, no longer really interested, because the figures have gone above his experience and almost are meaningless. Millions of Americans do not know how many million dollars make up a billion.”

Obama insists that he doesn’t want the government to run car companies, but he has fired CEOs, demonized bondholders, ensured the UAW gets the sweetest deal, and guaranteed warrantees. He insists that he doesn’t want to run banks, but his Treasury Department hesitates to take back some of the TARP funds that give them influence over bank policies. He’s critical of Wall Street, but he signed off on Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner’s remarkably generous plan to give hedge funds and private investors a low-risk, high-reward option on toxic assets.

Much of this is explained by Alinsky’s epigram, “In the politics of human life, consistency is not a virtue.”

During the campaign, Obama’s critics laughed and marveled at how quickly the candidate threw inconvenient friends, allies, and supporters under the bus once they became political liabilities. Over on the Campaign Spot, it’s been easy to compile a list of quickly forgotten promises. But it is unlikely that Obama would consider any of this a character flaw; instead, it is evidence of his adaptability and gift for seeing the big picture.

Alinsky sneered at those who would accept defeat rather than break their principles: “It’s true I might have trouble getting to sleep because it takes time to tuck those big, angelic, moral wings under the covers.” He assured his students that no one would remember their flip-flops, scoffing, “The judgment of history leans heavily on the outcome of success or failure; it spells the difference between the traitor and the patriotic hero. There can be no such thing as a successful traitor, for if one succeeds he becomes a founding father.” If you win, no one really cares how you did it.

Lizza’s profile offered an example of how Obama isn’t quite as cynical as Alinsky’s power-at-all-costs mentality would suggest:

Moreover, when Obama’s ideals clash with reality, he has been able to find compromises that don’t put him at a political disadvantage. For instance, no Democrat can win the general election while adhering to the public financing system if the Republican nominee doesn’t do the same. Clinton and John Edwards have simply conceded that the public financing system is dead and are ignoring fund-raising restrictions that would be triggered if either ends up playing within the public financing scheme. Facing the same situation, Obama — a longtime champion of campaign finance reform in general and public financing in particular — asked the Federal Election Commission if he could raise the potentially restricted money now (the world as it is) but then give it back if he wins the nomination and convinces his Republican opponent to stick with public financing (the world as we would like it to be).

But Obama quickly ignored that pledge when Senator McCain indicated he was willing to restrict himself to the public-financing system. Obama audaciously claimed that his donors had created a “parallel public-financing system” and announced his changed position at a fundraising dinner.

Moderates thought they were electing a moderate; liberals thought they were electing a liberal. Both camps were wrong. Ideology does not have the final say in Obama’s decision-making; an Alinskyite’s core principle is to take any action that expands his power and to avoid any action that risks his power.

As conservatives size up their new foe, they ought to remember: It’s not about liberalism. It’s about power. Obama will jettison anything that costs him power, and do anything that enhances it — including invite Rick Warren to give the benediction at his inauguration, dine with conservative columnists, and dismiss an appointee at the White House Military Office to ensure the perception of accountability.

Alinsky’s influence goes well beyond Obama, obviously. There are many wonderful Democrats in this world, but evidence suggests that rising in that party’s political hierarchy requires some adoption of a variation of the Alinsky philosophy: Power comes first. Few Democrats are expressing outrage over Nancy Pelosi’s ever-shifting explanation of what she knew about waterboarding. Those who screamed bloody murder about Jack Abramoff’s crimes avert their eyes from John Murtha. The anti-war movement that opposed the surge in Iraq remains silent about sending additional troops to Afghanistan. Obama will never get as much grief for his gay-marriage views as Miss California.

It’s not about the policies or the politics, and it’s certainly not about the principles. It’s about power, and it has been for a long time.

— Jim Geraghty writes the Campaign Spot for NRO.

Obama’s plan stimulates the deficit, not the economy

2009-05-19T18:37:00.001-07:00

Obama’s plan stimulates the deficit, not the economy
By: Examiner Editorial
-
05/19/09 12:05 AM EDT President Obama’s much-ballyhooed American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 – the economic stimulus plan - isn’t stimulating much of anything except federal employment, despite having been rammed through Congress as emergency legislation in February. That’s the only conclusion to be drawn from the most recent Labor Department unemployment figures. Since the $787 billion spending measure was approved, 1.2 million Americans have lost their jobs and unemployment has ratcheted up to 8.9 percent – the highest it’s been since 1983. Unemployment is beyond even what President Barack Obama’s own economic advisors predicted it would be with no recovery plan – and definitely not what Americans were told to expect.

Meanwhile, spending touted as “timely, temporary and targeted” that was supposed to be flooding the economy is barely trickling out of the federal bureaucracy. Less than $29 billion – a mere four percent of the stimulus package– has been spent so far. So much for the “timely” part of the Obama mantra. Let’s not forget here that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were so hell-bent to get the bill through Congress that they refused to allow members sufficient time to read the massive 1,079-page spending bill before voting on it. One consequence was that the bill was stuffed with spending that is anything but temporary. So we can all wave goodbye to that part of the mantra.

Obama said on national television not long ago that the stimulus bill had “saved or created over 150,000 jobs.” But how can that be when joblessness increased a full percentage point after his stimulus package was passed? And there’s that uncomfortable fact uncovered by an Associated Press study that found that states hit hardest by the recession are getting the least amount of stimulus spending. There goes the targeted part of the mantra.

The failure of the stimulus bill to boost the economy as promised is further exacerbated by the president’s budget, which explodes the 2010 federal deficit to $1.8 trillion, and the bailouts of two of Detroit’s Big Three automakers. George Mason economist Tyler Cowen predicted such dismal results when he pointed out that “it is very hard to find [historical] examples of successful fiscal stimulus driving an economic recovery. Ever.” In other words, the stimulus package was passed without any evidence that it would work. “It is becoming increasingly clear that the long-term fiscal strategy of the White House is based on large doses of wishful thinking,” concludes Harvard economist and former Bush administration advisor Greg Mankiw. But when you insist on ignoring basic economic principles, wishful thinking is all that's left.

MSNBC Mocks Creationism

2009-05-18T20:27:00.000-07:00

We are Americans!!

2009-05-15T20:20:00.001-07:00

More Acorn Voter Fraud Comes to Light

2009-05-12T11:49:00.000-07:00

By JOHN FUND
Democrats are split on how to deal with Acorn, the liberal "community organizing" group that deployed thousands of get-out-the-vote workers last election. State and city Democratic officials -- who've been contending with its many scandals -- are moving against it. Washington Democrats are still sweeping Acorn abuses under a rug.

On Monday, Nevada officials charged Acorn, its regional director and its Las Vegas field director with submitting thousands of fraudulent voter registration forms last year. Larry Lomax, the registrar of voters in Las Vegas, says he believes 48% of Acorn's forms "are clearly fraudulent." On Thursday, prosecutors in Pittsburgh, Pa., also charged seven Acorn employees with filing hundreds of fraudulent voter registrations before last year's general election.

Acorn spokesman Scott Levenson calls the Nevada criminal complaint "political grandstanding" and says that any problems were the actions of an unnamed "bad employee." But Catherine Cortez Masto, Nevada's Democratic Attorney General, told the Las Vegas Sun that Acorn itself is named in the criminal complaint. She says that Acorn's training manuals "clearly detail, condone and . . . require illegal acts," such as requiring its workers to meet strict voter-registration targets to keep their jobs.

Other Democrats on the ground have complaints. Fred Voight, deputy election commissioner in Philadelphia, protested after Acorn (according to the registrar of voters and his own investigation) submitted at least 1,500 fraudulent registrations last fall. "This has been going on for a number of years," he told CNN in October. St. Louis Democrat Matthew Potter, the city's deputy elections director, had similar complaints.

Elsewhere, Washington state prosecutors fined Acorn $25,000 after several employees were convicted of voter registration fraud in 2007. The group signed a consent decree with King County (Seattle), requiring it to beef up its oversight or face criminal prosecution. In the 2008 election, Acorn's practices led to investigations, some ongoing, in 14 other states.

The stink is bad enough that some congressional Democrats have taken notice. At a March 19 hearing on election problems, Michigan Rep. John Conyers, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, pressed New York Rep. Gerald Nadler, chairman of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, to hold a hearing on Acorn. He called the charges against it "serious." Mr. Nadler agreed to consider the request.

Mr. Nadler's office now says there will be no hearing on Acorn because Mr. Conyers has changed his mind. Mr. Conyers's office released a statement on Monday saying that after reviewing "the complaints against Acorn, I have concluded that a hearing on this matter appears unwarranted at this time." A Democratic staffer told me he believes the House leadership put pressure on Mr. Conyers to back down. Mr. Conyers's office says it is "unaware" of any contacts with House leaders.

Then there's Barney Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. Last month, he voted for a committee amendment (to the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act) by Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R., Minn.) to block groups indicted for voter fraud from receiving federal housing or legal assistance grants. Identical language was passed into law in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. Mr. Frank now says he "had not read [the amendment] carefully" before backing it. He gutted the amendment on Thursday, claiming that the language Congress passed just last year is "a violation of the basic principles of due process."

A lot of money is at stake. In the stimulus bill passed by Congress, Acorn is eligible -- along with other activist groups -- to apply for $2 billion in funds to redevelop abandoned and foreclosed homes. Meanwhile, public records show that last spring the IRS filed three tax liens totaling almost $1 million against Acorn, most of which concerned employee withholding.

All of this infuriates Marcel Reid, who, along with seven other national Acorn board members, was removed last year after demanding an audit of the group's books. "Acorn has been hijacked by a power-hungry clique that has its own political and personal agendas," she told me. "We are fighting to take back the group."

Bertha Lewis, the head of Acorn, told me last year before their ouster that the "Acorn Eight" were "obsessed" and "confused." But Anita MonCrief, an Acorn whistleblower, says the problems run deep. Ms. MonCrief worked at Project Vote, an Acorn affiliate, in late 2007. She says its development director, Karen Gillette, told her she had direct contact with the Obama campaign and also told her to call Obama donors who had maxed out on donations to the candidate but who could contribute to Acorn. Project Vote calls her charges "absolutely false." (Ms. Gillette has declined comment.)

Acorn's relationship to the Obama campaign is a matter of public record. Last year, Citizens Consulting Inc., the umbrella group controlling Acorn, was paid $832,000 by the Obama campaign for get-out-the-vote efforts in key primary states. In filings with the Federal Election Commission, the campaign listed the payments as "staging, sound, lighting," only correcting them after reporters from the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review revealed their true nature.

Mr. Obama distanced himself from the group's scandals last year, saying "We don't need Acorn's help." Nevertheless, he got his start as a community organizer at Acorn's side. In 1992, he headed a registration effort for Project Vote, an Acorn partner at the time. In 1995, he represented Acorn in a key case upholding the new Motor Voter Act -- the very law whose mandated postcard registration system Acorn workers use to flood election offices with bogus registrations.

But Acorn's registration tricks may soon be unnecessary. Congressional Democrats are backing a bill to mandate a nationwide data base to automatically register driver's license holders or recipients of government benefits.

This "would create an engraved invitation for voter fraud," says Hans von Spakovsky, a former Federal Election Commission member, who points out that these lists are filled with felons and noncitizens who are ineligible to vote. Ironically, in light of its troubles with the law, Acorn was selected in March to assist the U.S. Census in reaching out to minority communities and recruiting census enumerators for the count next year.

As for the Nevada indictment, Acorn isn't worried. "We've had bad publicity before, and all it does is inform the community that we're here working for the community," Bonnie Greathouse, Acorn's head organizer in Nevada, assured the Las Vegas Review-Journal this week. "People always come forward to our defense. We're just community organizers, just like the president used to be."

Mr. Fund is a columnist for WSJ.com .

Obama and Chrysler

2009-05-06T20:10:00.000-07:00

2009-05-05T14:01:00.000-07:00

Newspapers leaning to the left until bitter end
Debra J. Saunders

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Why are most newspaper reporters and editors liberal? I've been working in the business for more than 20 years, and I can't give a quick, definitive answer to the question. But I do think a contributing factor is that editors, like other managers, tend to hire and reward staffers who think as they do. They see their positions as neutral, which is human nature - and is reinforced by the fact that the folks in the desks around them vote the same way they do.

When they read about complaints of media bias, editors write the criticism off because they see reporters every day trying to cover stories fairly and succeeding. They fail to notice that their shared ideology limits what they see as stories.

Which is why, I believe, that Fox News Channel ratings are so high. As the New York Times reported, CNN reached 271,000 viewers ages 25 to 54 in prime time in April, less than half of Fox News' 668,000. In the first quarter of 2009, Fox News beat CNN and MSNBC combined in the Nielsen ratings.

Liberals mock the news network's "fair and balanced" slogan. But if you read your average newspaper, then tune into Fox News or listen to conservative talk radio, it evens out. People hungry for a conservative outlook don't believe they see their values in the news or features pages. Liberal newspapers helped build conservative media.

I should note that there's a world of difference between Fox during the day and Fox after dark. Primetime programs feature conservative hosts trading on their opinions, while Fox daytime features straight reportage.

The network's full-tilt promotion of the TEA (Taxed Enough Already) party protests on April 15 , alas, undercut the whole network's credibility as reporters covered events at which Fox News biggies like Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck were star speakers. Not fair. Not balanced.

CNN execs have responded to the success of Fox News by noting that their own audience numbers and profits are up. They also argue that their brand is purer because, as CNN president Jon Klein told The New York Times, "There are several networks that reside in the cable news category, but only one that reliably delivers the news unbiased."

Well, not quite. It turns out CNN has its own TEA Party baggage. Covering a protest in Chicago, veteran reporter Susan Roesgen lost her cool. She interviewed a man protesting high taxes and government debt with his 2-year-old and began to argue with him: "Do you realize that you're eligible for a $400 credit?" Roesgen asked him. And: "Did you know that the state of Lincoln gets $50 billion out of the stimulus (package pushed by President Obama)?" It was as if Roesgen thought she was White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs.

Then she dismissed the event as "anti-government" and "anti-CNN" - and the product of the "right-wing conservative network, Fox."

Asked about Roesgen, CNN's response: "No comment."

In this space I have lamented what seems to be the advent of Designer News, which allows consumers to cull out undesirable viewpoints and information.

The irony here is that newspapers have written fawning stories about Google and Twitter and free classified ad sites as if they are all good. But when newspapers cover Fox News, they have this need to write the network off as right-wing - end of story. Nothing to learn there, right?

Clearly there is an insatiable appetite for news from a conservative perspective that the folks who run newspapers continue to overlook - except in the opinion pages.

There are days I wonder if newspaper and network news execs cannot change by broadening their ideological diversity - even to save themselves. They'll keep telling themselves that they are unbiased - up until the end.

To comment, e-mail Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@sfchronicle.com.

Redistributive Wealth-Obama

2009-05-04T20:02:00.000-07:00

Okay the above audio was recorded in 2001. The bill HR 1388 is putting what he said in that audio in action.This is all getting very surreal. Obama didn't listen to Reverend Wright? Of course he did, his policies prove it. "Our roosters have come home to roost" quote Reverend Wright-Obama -Social Justice Begins.....Our Constitution is our document that formed this Great Country--It can't be thrown aside!!

Janet Napalitano Resign NOW!!!

2009-04-23T10:29:00.000-07:00

This is a Gestapo like in our Homeland Security Office. She has all ready tried to bully the Conservatives in this Country by releasing the report that warned against "Right Wing Extremist". Then she gave a non-apology and insulted our men and women fighting and retired from the Armed Services!!! Wake Up -Silent Majority and let them know in Washington who runs this Country!!! Not the few in Washington that are soooo out of touch, but the real Americans that deal with the real issues---and nobody is listening!!

The Death of Common Sense

2009-04-21T14:59:00.001-07:00

Common sense leaves this world

03.04.2009

A S EXPECTED a front-page letter and story last week about teenagers showing up in Napier for a rave brought immediate responses from our readers.
Most were from parents who couldn't believe others simply dropped their children, including young girls, in the CBD without checking any details.

One letter writer mentioned the existence of a "common sense" email.

M. Brown has kindly sent it into me and there are parts of it I would like to share with readers.

It is an obituary to common sense and many points ring true.

"My parents told me about Mr Common Sense early in my life and told me I would do well to call on him when making decisions.

"Common Sense lived by simple, sound financial policies (don't spend more than you earn) and reliable parenting strategies (adults, not children are in charge).
"Common Sense lost ground when parents attacked teachers for doing the job they themselves failed to do in disciplining their unruly children.

"Common Sense lost the will to live as the Ten Commandments became contraband; churches became businesses; and criminals received better treatment than their victims.

"Common Sense took a beating when you couldn't defend yourself from a burglar in your own home and the burglars can sue you for assault."

Liquor store owner Virender Singh may like this paragraph updated to include "your own shop".

The Otara shopkeeper was cleared last week of using excessive force against two teens who were trying to rob his shop.

His crime - he defended himself and his livelihood.

He was stabbed following an altercation outside his store.

He wielded a hockey stick - his attackers a knife.

Unfortunately we read about robberies and attempted hold-ups of dairies and other small businesses on a weekly basis.

"Common Sense was preceded in death by his parents, Truth and Trust; his wife Discretion; his daughter Responsibility; and his son Reason.

"He is survived by three stepbrothers - I Know My Rights, Someone is to Blame, and I'm a Victim.

"Not many attended his funeral because so few realised he was gone

Washington Times -

2009-04-18T10:16:00.000-07:00

It is very obvious by the following article in the Washington Times, the Liberals have more than a few screws loose. We really believe it is because,we, as Conservatives have sat back and let them run wild.Running wild in a ocean of ideas that have no focus, after a while, will make you a little dingy!!!
We have read the article at least 10 times and we can't get the mindset! Liberals say their open minded, but.....but what they spew is unadultrated hate. And last time I read about hate, it tends to be pretty narrow minded!!!
This is of all the Hollywood Elite. They rance around the country spewing their Liberal garbage,their socialism(Sean Penn).It is really irritating that we(Conservatives) put the money in their pockets (watching their movies)so they can come against us!! IT is CRAZY!!! We really need to get hyper-focused and give them a BIG message, the one they will listen to. Stop buying their movies,stop buying the products that support them. Meaning the sponsors for MSNBC,CNN,.Hit them where it hurts. The pocketbook!!
Why do they have so much hate for Patriots of this Country?

Washington Times

By Amanda Carpenter on April 17, 2009 into The Back Story
Subscribe
Liberal actress and political activist Janeane Garofalo, in all seriousness, said activists who attended tea parties are racists with dysfunctional brains in a recent prime-time television appearance.

"Let's be very honest about what this is about. This is not about bashing Democrats. It's not about taxes. They have no idea what the Boston Tea party was about. They don't know their history at all. It's about hating a black man in the White House," she said on MSNBC's "The Countdown" with Keith Olbermann Thursday evening. "This is racism straight up and is nothing but a bunch of teabagging rednecks. There is no way around that."

Olbermann did not once try to challenge her on those assertions.

The actress went on to describe the brain size of typical "right-winger, Republican or conservative or your average white power activist."

"Their synapses are misfiring. ... It is a neurological problem we are dealing with," she said. This isn't the first time she's offered this analysis, either. Ms. Garofalo said similar things about Alaskan GOP Governor Sarah Palin's brain last February in an interview with an environmental blog.

The actress went on to bash the GOP on MSNBC Thursday because it had "crystallized into the white power movement" as well as Fox News, which she said has captured the "Klan demo[graphic]."

"Who else is Fox talking to? Urban older white guys and their girlfriends who suffer from Stockholm Syndrome," she said.

Ironically, Ms. Garofalo is currently playing a role on the drama 24, which is aired by the Fox Broadcasting Company and is popular among conservative circles.

Butter would Not Melt in her Mouth

2009-04-17T14:01:00.001-07:00

CNN BIASED REPORTER

2009-04-17T13:43:00.000-07:00

I think this Video speaks for itself!!! This is incredible, that this same news organization will report this way for Patriot Tea Parties but report for a Lefist Agenda in a much different way!! All I can say is "Elitist Agenda with a Microphone"

Writings of Thomas Jefferson

2009-04-16T18:48:00.000-07:00

The next event which excited our sympathies for Massachusetts was the Boston port bill, by which that port was to be shut up on the 1st of June, 1774. This arrived while we were in session in the spring of that year. The lead in the house on these subjects being no longer left to the old members, Mr. Henry, R. H. Lee, Fr. L. Lee, 3 or 4 other members, whom I do not recollect, and myself, agreeing that we must boldly take an unequivocal stand in the line with Massachusetts, determined to meet and consult on the proper measures in the council chamber, for the benefit of the library in that room. We were under conviction of the necessity of arousing our people from the lethargy into which they had fallen as to passing events; and thought that the appointment of a day of general fasting & prayer would be most likely to call up & alarm their attention. No example of such a solemnity had existed since the days of our distresses in the war of '55, since which a new generation had grown up. With the help therefore of Rushworth, [a popular book, John Rushworth's Historical Collections] whom we rummaged over for the revolutionary precedents & forms of the Puritans of that day, preserved by him, we cooked up a resolution, somewhat modernizing their phrases, for appointing the 1st day of June, on which the Port bill was to commence, for a day of fasting, humiliation & prayer, to implore heaven to avert from us the evils of civil war, to inspire us with firmness in support of our rights, and to turn the hearts of the King & parliament to moderation & justice. To give greater emphasis to our proposition, we agreed to wait the next morning on Mr. Nicholas, whose grave & religious character was more in unison with the tone of our resolution and to solicit him to move it. We accordingly went to him in the morning. He moved it the same day; the 1st of June was proposed and it passed without opposition. The Governor dissolved us as usual-Thomas Jefferson 1774----The next event which excited our sympathies for Massachusetts was the Boston port bill, by which that port was to be shut up on the 1st of June, 1774. This arrived while we were in session in the spring of that year. The lead in the house on these subjects being no longer left to the old members, Mr. Henry, R. H. Lee, Fr. L. Lee, 3 or 4 other members, whom I do not recollect, and myself, agreeing that we must boldly take an unequivocal stand in the line with Massachusetts, determined to meet and consult on the proper measures in the council chamber, for the benefit of the library in that room. We were under conviction of the necessity of arousing our people from the lethargy into which they had fallen as to passing events; and thought that the appointment of a day of general fasting & prayer would be most likely to call up & alarm their attention. No example of such a solemnity had existed since the days of our distresses in the war of '55, since which a new generation had grown up. With the help therefore of Rushworth, [a popular book, John Rushworth's Historical Collections] whom we rummaged over for the revolutionary precedents & forms of the Puritans of that day, preserved by him, we cooked up a resolution, somewhat modernizing their phrases, for appointing the 1st day of June, on which the Port bill was to commence, for a day of fasting, humiliation & prayer, to implore heaven to avert from us the evils of civil war, to inspire us with firmness in support of our rights, and to turn the hearts of the King & parliament to moderation & justice. To give greater emphasis to our proposition, we agreed to wait the next morning on Mr. Nicholas, whose grave & religious character was more in unison with the tone of our resolution and to solicit him to move it. We accordingly went to him in the morning. He moved it the same day; the 1st of June was proposed and it passed without opposition. The Governor dissolved us as usual----The next event which excited our sympathies for Massachusetts was the Boston port bill, by which that port was to be shut up on the 1st of June, 1774. This arrived while we were in session in the spring of that year. The lead in the house on these subjects being no longer left to the old members, Mr. Henry, R. H. Lee, Fr. L. Lee, 3 or 4 other members, whom I do not recollect, and myself, agreeing that we must boldly take an unequivocal stand in the line with Massachusetts, determined to meet and consult on the proper measures in the council chamber, for the benefit of the library in that room. We were under conviction of the necessity of arousing our people from the lethargy into which they had fallen as to passing events; and thought that the appointment of a day of general fasting & prayer would be most likely to call up & alarm their attention. No example of such a solemnity had existed since the days of our distresses in the war of '55, since which a new generation had grown up. With the help therefore of Rushworth, [a popular book, John Rushworth's Historical Collections] whom we rummaged over for the revolutionary precedents & forms of the Puritans of that day, preserved by him, we cooked up a resolution, somewhat modernizing their phrases, for appointing the 1st day of June, on which the Port bill was to commence, for a day of fasting, humiliation & prayer, to implore heaven to avert from us the evils of civil war, to inspire us with firmness in support of our rights, and to turn the hearts of the King & parliament to moderation & justice. To give greater emphasis to our proposition, we agreed to wait the next morning on Mr. Nicholas, whose grave & religious character was more in unison with the tone of our resolution and to solicit him to move it. We accordingly went to him in the morning. He moved it the same day; the 1st of June was proposed and it passed without opposition. The Governor dissolved us as usual----http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/account/index.htm

Communist Praises Washington Politicians

2009-04-15T20:16:00.000-07:00

http://pww.org/article/view/14967

Read the article.This man Sam Webb is described as The Communist. The Left likes to associate Hitler or Stalin to the Conservatives, but is just hot air!! They know their talking points and if they repeat it enough people will believe it!!This is crazy!! People Wake up!!

Cheyenne Wyoming Tea Party April 15 2009

2009-04-15T14:15:00.000-07:00

One Nation Under God

2009-04-12T16:58:00.000-07:00

New World Order-They finally Said what they Mean!!!

2009-04-02T20:30:00.001-07:00

Morning Joe=Morning Jerk

2009-03-31T16:15:00.000-07:00

The encounter of Tuesday mornings show of Morning Joe, was a digusting specatacle of a gagle of idiots. Mocking Glenn Beck made them look like the school bully that is so insecure they have to pick on the Good kid in school, because they are jealous. Mika, Joe, and your flaky guests-Shut UP and Go Home. You aint got it and Glenn does!!!

American Idol President

2009-03-25T14:36:00.000-07:00

The President is very determined to have a BIGGER Government!!!And he is doing it with the pretext that he is saving our Country. If this isn't a piece of work. I thought his words on last nights Press Conference, was kinda self prophetic. He said he felt like he was on American Idol and everyone else was Simon Cowell. Well, him being on American Idol, is true. He ran a race that wasn't about the direction of our Country. He ran a race that saturated the population that he could bamboozle. He and his minions captured this Country!! But Americans are not stupid!!!Go on a search engine. Type in "I regret voting for Barack Obama" you will be amazed. And as Dick Morris says,Obama does not care to be re elected!! He cares about his footprint, that is it!!! He thinks he is Abraham Lincoln. Reality Check-Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. He did not believe in Big Government.He was a man of integrity. We knew about his education, about his past. All we have gotten from this President is a fairy tale that was made up. He is a Homogenized President that sang the tune right and the most people called in to American Idol-Voila!! We have the American Idol President!!

Ron Paul

2009-03-24T18:33:00.000-07:00

The Leader WE Deserve?

2009-03-19T20:44:00.000-07:00

Obama Says Economy Sound-Really?

2009-03-17T19:14:00.000-07:00

This is OUR Country!!

2009-03-16T20:06:00.000-07:00

Liberals Esteem Themselves Way too Much!!

2009-03-10T19:35:00.000-07:00

Reading Liberal Garbage today. So tedious!! Don't they have any other mantra besides "Oh poor us, we didn't do it, it's someone else's fault" These misguided folks are quite sad, really!!! They have no moral base! None whatsoever.
In fact, they haven't changed their tune since the 60's, you know that era that they like to refer to as the "Age of Aquarius!! Love, Peace , Dope. The Love thing, kinda got translated to "have sex with whoever, and as many whoevers the better". Well that behavior ushered in the Aids epidemic. You know the virus, that the Liberal Media labeled as "Everyone's disease". Hiding from the Country where and what behavior caused such a tragedy!! The Peace thing, well it brought about smelly , greasy hippies that would spit on fighting young men that came back from Vietnam. Yeah, they were so cool.Ask them, they think so!! And the Dope, well that is almost sewed up, Most of the Liberals smoke the dope or pop the pills, hey they still like to "trip man"!!!
So why does it suprise us when these fried brained losers, talk and it all sounds like Garbage. They live in a bubble that no one in their right mind, wants to be apart of . Then when they come out and speak there gorble, they call us Conservative's dumb, because we don't understand Elitism. Elitism speaks of things discovered while on PCP or Marijuana. This language is spoken to other mindless drones that have no regard for humane life, want more laws so they won't enforce them.The want for more goverment control, because they believe they have such a heightened sense of what this Country needs. They don't admire our forefathers, they regard them as misguided primitive leaders that they will soon straighten out!! They are a wierd bunch , but in their circles, they are BOMB!! They admire people like Cesar Chavez,Fidel Castro, and Che!! Now you know that to admire that muderous bunch you have to be "Not in your Right Mind"

We Surround Them-They work for us!!!

2009-03-06T18:09:00.000-08:00

Mr Steele "Don't Sell Out"

2009-03-03T07:20:00.000-08:00

Mr.Steele,

We understand you want to update the Republican National Committee, but it does not need updating iT needs to get back to it's roots!!! Have the liberals backed off, No they keeping pushing their antifamily agenda!! They have went from Roe V Wade to wanting homosexuals to marry,destroying the traditional family!!! And when Sean Penn, gets up to the podium at the Oscars and tells christians "Shame on You" he is praised for being inclusive!! Conservatives are so sick of hearing how the Liberal party is so "inclusive". Which in my opinoin is such a BIG LIE!!
Let's take a look!!
Babies can be killed, at will, just so a woman keeps her right to CHOOSE to kill it. Babies, not included in the Liberal Agenda. Christians, bad- because they want to keep marriage between a man and a woman. Christians, not included in the Liberal agenda.Old people that have no more use in them, they want euthinasia,elderly and sick are not in the Liberal Agenda.Capitilist, people that want to have personal responsibility and a free trade market, Capitilist are not part of the Liberal Agenda!!
They have the Audacity to say the GOP is the NAZI Party-give me a break. Hitler wanted to and did kill off what he believed to be an inferior people. Hitler kills Jews. Liberals kill Babies!!! Hitler wanted a market system where everyone shared everything and he was in control of who go what!! Hitler was Socialist. Liberals are Socialist!!Along with the Jews Hitler killed the weak and the feeble. Hitler used Euthanasia. Liberals want Euthanasia.Hitler and Stalin burned Christian Bibles. Hitler anti-Christian. Liberals anti-Christian!!
I have watch these wacko Liberals cry over an animal being abandoned, but the same wackos will march in a line to keep the right of a woman to end the life a human Being!! It is so sick!! The anger we saw in California, after the passage of Prop 8 was so typical of the Liberals.They were fine that Barack Obama won, by the majority, but would not accept the majority had spoke in California!! Irony or Hipocracy!! You be the judge!!!
I gave up all movies, I don't buy them, I don't go and watch them. Maybe we can shut up these Hollywood elites. We need to stop supporting them so they can talk against our principles.They are idiots!! They can stand in front of a camera and act. SO WHAT!! That does not give them liscense to rip this country apart with their Liberal Anti-God Agenda!!! Go to your mansion and sip your whatever and keep your opinions to your crowd, WE DON'T CARE!!!
America Wake Up before it is too Late!!! This Country is Changing, and it does not even resemble the Priciples it was founded on!!!!This is not new Change, Hitler tried this 60 years ago!!!
GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH

CPAC- Listen and Learn!!

2009-03-03T07:18:00.001-08:00

Conservatives Unite!!

2009-03-02T14:48:00.000-08:00

Come on Conservatives!!Get off teh pot!! This is ridiculous, we have got to get our stuff together and make our voice heard!! We need to get the Tea Parties really organized with huge amounts of people.This is what has made this Country Great!! Let our Voices sound loudly, with the Star Spangled Banner running in our heads. Knowing that this Country can not go down the Toilet because America was sleeping when they elected him. His Arrogance they mistakenly took for Confidence and experience!! Remember those cold winters that George Washington kept his men going , when they could go no more!! He did that for us!! For the Free Country that his men fought for.
When the Virginia Company started a little Colony and called it Jamestown. The first Winter 70% of the Colony died. They perservered.They fought their way through the hard times. America it is going to get a lot worse. Economically we are going to be devasted!! But we have our freedom and our dignity!!!! The economy has to hit bottom, if you sell out now, you will have ,no freedom or dignity!!! Come on America "Give me Liberty or Give me Death!!!!"

Socialism is in the Air!!

2009-03-02T14:38:00.000-08:00

Keith Olbermann- Village Idiot

2007-11-05T17:59:00.000-08:00

I am truly a person of great self control. But I do find myself turning over to Keith Olbermanns joke of a program . Only because it doesn't interest me to listen to the mail bag on the O'Reilly Factor. I will always wish that my better judgement had won out on this very evening!!!
I can not begin to tell you how completely nauseating Keith Olbermann's attempt at a educated program has failed. This man is at his lowest point , there is no doubt. And MSNBC, they , for giving him a forum, are truly headed for the train wreck Olberamann is racing their network towards.
Maybe the Ultra Left, the only audience that Olberamann could possibly have, are under the assumption that their views are not extreme or ridiculous. If so , I suggest they get out more!!!! The agenda they spew is ultimately the agenda that will be their ultimate downfall. As of now they are on a crazy, trippin', whoa dude, spiral out of control.
Olbermann is that weird dude at a cocktail party, you listen to, at your dismay, and thank God when he zero's in on another helpless victim!!! The ridiculous Ranter that can't recognize a level headed conversation because he is so into his narcissistic head so much, he can't be wrong. That is why the man is at the bottom of the barrel on MSNBC. He has been fired and fired and now MSNBC.
It is really soooo ironic that the Ultra Left is so hateful. I really thought these were the Love Peace and Dope group. Make Love , Not War!!! But they are the most hateful group to date. They use to be harmless, because of their insistence of Moral Debauchery as the norm. They say don't torture terrorist, and Abortion doesn't kill babies. Capital Punishment is wrong, That President Bush lied. Clinton was great, oh sex in the oval office, no big deal. If Hillary can take it , so can we.
First time since Bill and Hillary left the White House our Country has had dignity. Dignity the office of President commands. I didn't respect Bill Clinton, but he was my President. And I gave his office respect.
Keith, you are a sad little man!!!! Little with dignity, Little with respect, Little with objectivity, Little Period!!!!

Olbermann & Air America Deserve each other!!!

2007-10-24T21:26:00.000-07:00

Keith Olbermann is a person that must have the most cushy job in Television. He can sit in front of a camera, do NO fair research at all, and spout what ever crap he wants. This is so incredible how warped CNN and MSNBC have truly became , they have not one drop of Journalism integrity left. These loons are the Soap Boxers of the Liberal Fringe of the Democratic Party. To think there are people out there that actually listen and believe the likes of Olbermann and Matthews just is so out there.
These are presumably educated people. But wherever they went to college it must of had Professors like Churchill, the kook from Colorado, that said we deserved 911.
Where are the fair and balanced news? Well thank God , for Fox News. They don't have it perfect, but they have it just right in so many areas. What a concept , showing both sides of a story. For the last 40 years many Americans sat back and yelled at their t.v sets. The liberal media was not fooling America. Now, we have a Venue!! And guess what. The ratings tell the whole story. Air America is diving and rumors of bankruptcy . Fox News ratings are threw the roof. Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Shawn Hannity. These are men that have subjects the majority of Americans want to hear. And what to the Libs want to do? They want to shut these men down. How? Lying , making up stuff, anything that can take away the listeners, that get disgusted listening to their liberal crap. Come on, Olbermann, you are a kook , that picked the right network!!! What did Dennis Miller say the initials MSNBC stand for?
You stay right there ? Because you need the money, and you still have a small audience, anyway!!!!

Dems using SCHIP for Politics

2007-10-19T15:45:00.001-07:00

I have to believe that the average American is not buying this" SCHIP, Bush hates our Children" crap!!! I hope so. This Congress is such a joke. Since the Dems have took over control, it has been obvious that the only goal they have is to make sure they can besmirch the Conservatives at every turn. Have they reached across that aisle, like they promised too? No, they haven't!!
They have sat on their side, chucking stink bombs over to the other side, waiting with baited breath, seeing if anything they throw will actually stick. They are a truly pathetic bunch. I do have to admit, It is difficult to not get discouraged when you see they way the Libs can lie, cheat and steal, whatever it takes, it is so sad.
America needs to look at San Fransisco, I mean, really look at San Fransisco. This is the Pilot city for every Liberal. This is their Utopia. I have to not say on negative word of The Bay Area of California, people know, as a rule, enough!!! But don't try to ignore this City any longer, Please read their papers, listen to their leaders. These are the people that think the whole Country needs to be just like them. Please look into this City. Listen to Keith Olbermann, and Wolf Blitzer and Chris Matthews, and don't stop there. Check on their information they are feeding you. Confirm , don't listen without being informed from many different sources.
What is very sad about the mainstream media and sources like the above mentioned is these reporters (debatable) are giving their opinion , with their very liberal slants. Keith Olbermann, was a sports casters, and not even a good one. How does that qualify him to even read the news. The other two , well , maybe they were at Woodstock.

Didn't we learn Anything from Rodney King?

2007-10-02T22:09:00.000-07:00

When Rodney King was beaten to a pulp by Los Angeles Police Officers, and then said those famous words "Why can't we all just get along"?. He wasn't talking about the United States Government. But it surely would apply just about now.
By the way, how much of the Country's business is actually getting done. Nothing. They are too getting as many sound bytes about how patriotic and stoic they truly are. Well Government Peoples, such as Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and all the liberal nuts, they are too busy attacking Patriots. Today was a real Gem, they wanted a measure voted on to condemn Rush Limbaugh, for a selected sound byte, taken completely out of context.
So let me see, these are the same group that voted against condemning Moveon.org for calling the man that leads our sons and daughters, General Betray Us. It is a sad day in D.C today. How do these people look in a mirror. How can they be so callous to our Service men and women.
Moveon. org and Media Matters are the sneaky little kids in first grade that hit you on the back of the head and then when you start crying, they blame another kid. The other kid is truly stunned but gets punished for doing absolutely nothing.
For all the frustration the Libs have caused in recent days, they have deflected from the fact that since they have taken control of Congress , their approval ratings are approaching the single digits. They sure aren't mentioning that fact lately.
It is really sad that when people watch this Olbermann guy and Anderson Cooper you get this one sided, Liberal crap that can only be referred to as visual Syrup Ipecac. They spew out their views , no two sided argument. Like they are God Almighty and their version is the only Version. That's what Libs do though, they want to change this Country so it no way resembles what our fore fathers intended.
Ask them, they want universal health care, redistribution of wealth, their media is the only true media. This sounds an awful lot like Socialism. This is America, we fight for freedom, not for Government in our business.

Harry Reid joins the Putz Brigade

2007-10-01T17:07:00.001-07:00

George Soros, Moveon.org Media Matters , Keith Olbermann, and now Harry Reid joins the Putz Brigade!!! You are a welcomed and predictable addition to this lovely group. I think you all are so far into a Liberal fog, you really can't discern how your stupid actions are being digested by the masses.
It's almost mind boggling to think these people and the groups their associated with are actually educated people. Maybe that is part of the problem. Us peons couldn't possibly know what is truth or lie, we will listen to the selective sound bytes were are hand fed. Come on, we know better, we as informed Americans always want to get the whole story.
And after the above mentioned people get their lies out there, and we find out they have lied, they look like idiots. But hey , it looks good on them.!!!!
Keep it up guys, you are doing a great job!!!!

Olbermann Read it and Weep Putz

2007-09-28T20:06:00.000-07:00

http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6472373.html

The above article is by the final word in ratings for the Big Three Cable News Channels and the way it looks , there is only on "Big Now:. Bye Bye Cnn Bye Bye MSNBC.
America is smart that don't need you talking down to them. Too Little too late.
Olbermann is a freak. Foxnews does not need to denfend itself. You are a liar and call it news. You will trully reap what you sow Mister. You see the numbers and you get sour grapes , how tacky it that?

President Bush : Man of Conviction

2007-09-28T19:50:00.000-07:00

I must commend President Bush for his service to our Country. A man that can't be bought and brought real respect back to the White House. Clinton had tarnished the office in such a way that to even think of the Clinton's back in the White House is very disturbing. I pray that the American People see that Liberalism is not a virtue but a rock around the neck of our Great Country, drowning us in the eyes of the World. The liberals blame Bush for the World hating us, for the Radical Muslims coming after us, not at all true. They see the San Fransisco Values, and the hold our whole Country to that Standard. Liberals are the Godless, the deviant parts of our Society, eating away at our Communities. Freedom to Liberals is " Anything goes" And that mentality is a dangerous road. I truly have faith in American Voters to know that our lives are really at stake. If they didn't know it before they should know it after the recent Democrat debate in Dartmouth College. Asked each candidate, how soon they would pull out of Iraq, the answers, I am sure, were not the ones the ultra liberals wanted to hear. Not the Hollywood Elite, not MoveOn. org .
This is reality , not some drug induced Philosophy that's sounds good to a Elite living a unrealistic life. Most Americans live "Real Lives" Paycheck to Paycheck and that want a candidate that can run this Country, with a firm hand.
I personally will never watch a Danny Glover, Sean Penn, or Kevin Spacey movie. Why? I have convictions too. The irony in their alliance with Dictator Hugo Chavez, is that they love free speech but form an alliance with a man that does not let his own people have that right!!!

Hillary Clinton Tsk..Tsk.Tsk

2007-09-26T11:40:00.000-07:00

The problem with the Clinton Camp is that the more they try to keep their dealings private the more they seem to see even more daylight. If it is true that Bill Clinton called up Gentleman's Quarterly and threatened them, how is this inconsistent for this group.
Threats and carry through of threats have been witnessed many times thought the careers of these two individuals.
This is a Machine that knows that what the public ,or their followers,think or perceive them to be ,is much more important than what the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" try to put in the public eye. If they can side step, and weasel through , keep quite, they are left blameless in the eyes of the people that so hate the Bush administration so much. Hate does blind, and in the case of the Clintons, they will ,of course monopolize on this hate.
This is the same duo, yes duo, that could have stopped Bin Laden, that cowards down every time he encountered the adversary. The driver , being Hillary Clinton, with the campaign she is running always on her mind and how her husband appeased the masses. Opening the way for her to take the job that she knew she was far more qualified ,than her skirt chasing husband. The wait was difficult , but now she can enjoy the fruits of her labor. And no one will stand in her way. She is determined , focused, and she feels she is truly destined to be President.
The only problem is if the Dems win the 08 election, our Country will forever be changed. This is the same administration that wanted to socialize our health care. Why does that not concern people. In 1950 this would have been called a road to communism and now is being spun as a Liberal with a Health care Plan.
Don't be surprised about what will come out about the Clintons , it will be a "busy as usual" format. The people that vote for them are the same people that wanted to censure President Clinton instead of impeach him for lying. They don't want to hold the office of President at a higher standard.This is truly troublesome. And should be taken very serious.

Bush you got the Right Stuff

2007-09-25T22:15:00.000-07:00

I have to commend President Bush on his speech in front of the General Assemby today. Kudos!!! You are a mans man, and you make me proud to be an American. You know what we don't and you stand your ground. These are perilous times and you have the whole world on your shoulders.
I am a person that likes to think about how another person deals with the problems in their lives, and moves on. I respect your "stay the course" attitude. That was the attitude of an America that I can't even remember. Of my grandparents and their parents.
Visiting D. C recently I was so moved by the speech of Abraham Lincoln. "United we stand, Divided we fall." That same speech could be given today,and be as valid as it was during the Civil War. What happened to the America that stood on the front line, ready at a moments notice, to defend our Country. Believing in the constitution that built this country?
Our boys are dying over there, and people are turning against their own Country. This is crazy. Is the concept of Radical Islam, just that, a concept?
I am sure that the South felt very right in their stance before entering into the Civil War, pitting brother against brother. So why can't it be understood that Radical Islam is not something we can sit down and hash out.
OK, I guess we can. Radical Islam, wants women to cover their heads, Homosexuality banned and punished. Women who are not virgins at their marriages put to death. Hollywood, oh, your just so gone!! And our terms in the negotiations..... Nothing. Because that is what Radical Islam wants ,all or nothing. And they will not stop until they get it.
So while the Liberals are out there moaning and complaing, putting down our men and women in the Service , our President, just remember this is not a temporary situation. This will go on and on and on.............

And I hope and pray that our Country and come together and know that this President is the best defense we have right now against our enemy that wants us to convert or die.

Olbermann: News Flash

2007-09-25T22:07:00.000-07:00

Didn't your momma teach you not to lie? I know she did , but you just need that spotlight so much you just gotta lie on a good man like Bill O'Reilly. It's OK , Keith you still have the whack jobs that watch you. Your base is really safe. I tuned onto you for 5 minutes and catch you in a lie!!! So buddy how much do you lie in your 60 minutes? Why do I turn over for 5 minutes? Well it's like a train wreck , you just gotta look!!! Keith your a a pathetic little man, your accolades are from people who smoke too much green stuff, and have a brain cell, or two, burnt years ago.

Keith you do conservative a great service , keep it up, your rants, I mean. People aren't stupid, most , anyway. You do your job well , Keep it up Dude.... "Whoa man, the guy with the glasses, he throws his papers in the air, and it looks so cooool"

Mars Attacks- Iran

2007-09-25T16:09:00.001-07:00

Here we are listening to the President of Iran , first at Columbia University and then at the pulpit of the United Nations. I so love Dennis Miller and the way he relates film , print to our Current Affairs. After all the President of Iran has said and done, we still want to invite him in our homes and see if he wants to "come in peace".
As in the movie "Mars Attacks" , we see each group of Americans go to the Martians , knowing, that they will be able to reason with the big, green ugly monsters, and each time the Martians vaporize these peace seekers. Oh, I can't tell you how the Hollywood Elite can listen and reason with a main that directly blames them for the fall of Morality in our Country. Of course he will court anyone in our Country. Hence he can divide. But do you really think that Anmadinejad wants to sit down with the part of our society his Religion and Country hate at their very core? Go ahead , I seen it before..... Watch "Mars Attacks....it will play that way for sure!!!!

The Idaho Stateman is in the Liberal Wacko's Pocket

2007-09-04T18:12:00.000-07:00

The Idaho Statesman is be portrayed by the National Media as if it were this sweet local paper that reflects it community. Hah!!!! This is a joke , we really need someone to investigate this rag. I know not one person that will pay for this paper. It is the consensus of the majority of Idahoans feel this Paper is not worthy to line a ferrets cage. Please America don't think this paper is in the best interest of Idaho, because it is not!!!
Dan Popkey , the reporter, that can't stop patting his self on the shoulder, is a Podunk unprofessional. This I have proof of , read his columns for one month. There's the proof!!!!!

Here comes the Calvary!!!!

2007-09-04T18:05:00.000-07:00

Fred Thompson is going to annouce his run for President on September 6. It is fantastic!!!! This is the guy we have been waiting for. This is the man that says what he means and means what he says. No special interest groups will get to this one. He is a strong individual with a clear message, and we are ready for his message. Yes, Fred there will be pressure, but sir, I do believe you are up for the challenge.
The Storm is coming and it's name is Fred Thompson.
This is a man that doesn't have a problem saying the same thing over and over again, because that's what you do. You don't change your mind every time you are in front of a new group of people.
Thank you Fred for coming forward, and answering the call!!!!!

Kudos Larry Craig!!!!

2007-09-01T09:47:00.000-07:00

Kudos to Larry Craig, Bill Sali,Luna, and Governor Butch Otter. You are a Classy bunch. You knew what had to be done and you did it . You didn't allow the much liberal media to taylor your behavior. You are truly Good people. And the state of Idaho is lucky to have you.
As Conservatives, we know that the Liberal Smear Campaign was in full force. And when they get it rolling , not much can be done to stop it. They knew they could get another Senator, didn't care who they took out. This is the party that defended a President that sat in the Oval office and carried on a Sexual relationship with an intern. This is truly a Party of flip-flop double standards. I guess , they think that because they fight for gay rights and abortion, the Peace Love, Kumbaya crew, that they can do whatever and it's OK.
This is a crazy mentality. This Country Morality is completely out of control.
It is so funny, I traveled to Williamsburg, VA this summer. This was their 400th Anniversary. I visited the Governors House where George Washington , John Adams would come and conduct Virgina's business. As I took a tour by a man dressed in period clothes .We came upon the room where all the lawmakers would gather at long table. The tour guide said that, at times, it would get heated and the men would go and get on their knees and ask God for Guidance.
This touched me dearly. Fast Forward 400 years.... It almost seems that the North and South have returned . But now slavery is replaced with , the life of a baby, Gay Marriage, etc. We are two definite sides and Conservatives have taken the Place of the North as the Morally Right , Just as our Republican President Abraham Lincoln had felt Morally Right to stop Slavery. He had the forsight to know that our Nation was on the wrong path.

Dan Popkey and the Idaho Statesman , Dynamic Duo

2007-08-31T20:20:00.000-07:00

Dan Popkey and the Idaho Statesman saved Gotham City (Boise and the Nation) again from the big bad Conservatives, that want to take over the World. At least that is how I think they perceive themselves.

Now, most Idahoans perceive them in a much different light. What is really obvious ,is how the Liberal Machine (Idaho Statesman) assisted by their side kick ,Dan Popkey , they live Liberal in their little world of The Newspaper that they use for the platform of performing the duties of "take out as many Conservatives as you can". Kinda reminiscent of Murphy Brown, and her Picture of Dan Quayle on the back of her office door, and shot it with darts.
This is our Liberal biased media, but instead of being in New York City or L.A, we are blessed with the entity right amongst us.
Hey, this is a free Country and Idaho stands firm to protect the rights of its residents. This paper is a Rag and the majority knows it.
It is so sad that we lost our Home Town paper a long time ago.

Dan Popkey is the Voice of Every Liberal in America

2007-08-30T13:47:00.000-07:00

Dan Popkey of the Idaho Statesman likes to think of himself as the Woodward and Bernstein of Boise Idaho, but in fact he is nothing more than a little liberal with a newspaper to spew his propaganda. The Idaho Statesman has lost their once thriving subscription base. Why? Well people like Dan Popkey come to our very conservative area, and he using the local newspaper to slam our conservative thinking and ideals. His articles make most here in Idaho fuming mad, and hence all he has reading his less than fecal matter trash is the ultra liberal, which are mostly California transplants anyway. No the Idaho Statesman has become in the last 6 years a big disappointment. The Paper attacks Conservatives at every turn , not at all hiding the fact that they are in line with the ultra liberals that they are. What is wrong with America when you can't have a small town paper reflect the community!!!!

A Piece of Kos

2007-08-02T19:59:00.000-07:00

I and many other people consider the Daily Kos a hateful and mean spirited website. One that should be classified with he KKK and Adolf Hitler. This is not a progressive forum. This is a mud slinging orgy. These people have no morals, standards or decorum in which to live their lives. Why should we be appalled at their caterwauling at anything or anyone that speaks to the moral degradation in our society. They were apparently stung by the 60's ideal that "if it feels good , do it" and they have no depths too low. We must not call them out , that indeed gives these socialist , free loving, hipsters, pure joy. They get a platform and they love it. Let their hate expose their deeds. Because nobody can be this hateful and succeed in anything. The hate will eat you alive.
It reminds me of when President Clinton was in office. No I did not vote for the man or like him, but as our President I respected his position in our society. Knowing that the Position of President is one of very much stress and angst, you have to know that your prayers must be on this Man, for he is in the drivers seat.
So please do not go back at this Liberal Libels, do not give them the satisfaction. Instead show them respect and consideration. Do not lower yourselves to their level of thinking. We have to believe that the Good always wins out over the Evil.